this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
352 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

4368 readers
391 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Israeli tech firm has quietly embedded spyware into Samsung smartphones - and it poses a serious surveillance threat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] splendid9583@kbin.earth 21 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

That website is an excellent resource, but they can't just expect everyone to have money for a pixel, even if privacy is a priority for me and many people, a pixel is just beyond the reach of the large majority of internet users.

Instead they need to make a curated list of less than ideal but still better than stock alternatives, or else people will just give up and get stock android instead.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Pixels are also running on poor hardware. This has always been the case, but recent releases are showing really poor cpu performance compared to competitors.

Edit: for example, the OnePlus 13 that was released 8 months before the Pixel 10 Pro is 40%+ faster, and $150-250 cheaper. The battery is also 20% lower capacity.

[–] xep@discuss.online 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted for stating a fact, because Pixel hasn't had competitive hardware for several iterations now.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)