this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
311 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

76337 readers
2237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (28 children)

I understand the gripes about Meta, but I don't understand how everyone clowns on this like the core concept is stupid or unwanted.

Easy $1000 sell: cycling / escooter accessory. People already regularly buy expensive sport glasses just for sun and wind protection. With a smart version of them like this, you add open ear headphone, and you add the potential for navigation directions, or even a Bluetooth rear view camera on the back of your helmet to get a virtual mirror.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I agree that head mounted displays can be useful, I'm contemplating getting something like it, but just no cameras, please. not in the frame, not backwards, not anywhere.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 month ago (8 children)

If you don’t have cameras you instantly lose a tonne of potential amazing functionality.

If you’re in public you have no expectation of privacy, so someone being able to photograph you or record you with glasses is no different to being able to do it with a camera or phone.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent, otherwise the only way is to move to the foresf. One should not have to be concerned about being recorded, especially children (a pdfile can take photos to pick “targets”, so to speak).

[–] d7sdx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pdfile will do it anyways. What concerns me is all those data will be streamed to Meta. They will relay it to Palantir. The best mass surveillance you can think of.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The glasses don't record and stream all the time btw. They don't have their own built in wireless connection to meta.

[–] d7sdx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

For now, just give it some more time. ;)

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent

Why? You're in a public space. You don't have privacy when you're out in public. There are already laws around taking photos of minors etc, but it being able to be done via glasses is no different to it being able to be done with a phone or a camera.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless society gets revolutionized so that people can remain in their homes as much as they want (and even then), that is not an option.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Being surveilled in your daily life, becoming a sitting duck.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)