this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37725 readers
664 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

lol it’s already out there on tens of millions of laptops, but I guess hubris is the way to go

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bollocks! 64k RAM is enough for anything!

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A more recent example:

"Nobody needs more than 4 cores for personal use!"

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know who said this, but my bet would be Intel. Without AMD, we would probably still stuck on 4 cores.

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Yep it's Intel.

They said it up until their competitor started offering more than 4 cores as a standard.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)