this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
47 points (88.5% liked)

Asklemmy

50842 readers
1263 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My short response. Yes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

marx talked about it. with sufficient automation, the value of Labor collapses. under socialism, this is a good thing. under capitalism it's a bad thing.

[–] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about under a technocracy? Sounds horrible

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lunatique@lemmy.ml 0 points 13 hours ago

It’s essentially a governance model driven by scientific, technical, and data-driven analysis. This would include control and input from Universities and Silicon Valley. The problem are the corporations that own a huge portion of SV are not benevolent in their practices on an employment level, a consumer level and certainly a powerful over ruling governmental level.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

money would either become worthless, or would have to stop representing labor. you would have two distinct classes with zero mobility between them. im taking a shit

load more comments (2 replies)