this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

1 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] philguyaz@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

In this thread are a bunch of people who don't know how executive orders, the executive branch or just our government works claiming some battshit nonsense.

[–] a_slay_nub@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Care to elaborate on what the actual reality of this EO is?

[–] raika11182@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I'm not who you responded to, but it does seem that there's a lot more fear-mongering about the executive order in this thread than actual problems. This is clearly aimed at basic regulation of huge AI. Lots of stuff in here is fairly common sense - help people determine what's created purely by machine vs what isn't so that they're not misinformed or defrauded, reform some data scraping stuff to protect privacy and keep an AI model from getting too much unnecessary personal info in its training (like, it probably doesn't need your home address to train, not that I don't imagine a use for such a thing, but that would need to be regulated).

Read the bullet points, it's not that long, and it's not that hard to understand. People are running around this thread talking about "Download and start torrenting everything OMG!". That's just... not a reasonable or rational take on the substance of the order. I would be concerned about things like the casual mention of predictive policing (though, again, regulation is needed to prevent it, so it's gotta be mentioned as something to be regulated).

But if you're an open source hobbyist or enthusiast, your reaction to this should be a resounding "meh". If you're a researcher or professional, I think I'd pay a lot more attention, but I'm not qualified to tell you whether or not the substance of it is a problem for your field.

[–] dividebynano@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We should make model distribution resistant to service disruption even if it's an overreaction.

[–] raika11182@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I would agree with that. I wouldn't do it as an reaction/overreaction to this, but redundancy is always good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)