this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1498 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
322 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] planetaryprotection@midwest.social 75 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Corporations are not people, therefore do not have a right to free speech.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wasn't that the whole crux of Citizens United?

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

CU vs FEC was specifically about campaign financing, but yeah basically ruled that organizations like corporations are protected by 1A, and money counts as free speech.

Which is obviously bullshit on every level, but just one way that a SCOTUS with a few corrupt individuals can destroy democracy for an entire country.

[–] nybble41@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They ruled that people acting together have all the same rights that they would have acting individually, and that preventing someone from spending money on producing and promoting their speech effectively prevents them from being heard. Which are both perfectly true, common-sense statements.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

They ruled that people acting together have all the same rights that they would have acting individually

Bullshit, corporations are not "people acting together", they're autocratic command structures where one or few people hold all the power.

preventing someone from spending money on producing and promoting their speech effectively prevents them from being heard

Also total bullshit, unless you agree that allowing people to be poor is a violation of the first amendment, because being poor effectively prevents them from being heard. Which you won't.

Which are both perfectly true, common-sense statements

I'm already confident you don't have a single ounce of common sense in your empty head after reading those two sentences.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

They ruled that people acting together have all the same rights that they would have acting individually

Bullshit, corporations are not "people acting together", they're autocratic command structures where one or few people hold all the power.

preventing someone from spending money on producing and promoting their speech effectively prevents them from being heard

Also total bullshit, unless you agree that allowing people to be poor is a violation of the first amendment, because being poor effectively prevents them from being heard. Which you won't.

Which are both perfectly true, common-sense statements

I'm already confident you don't have a single ounce of common sense in your empty head after reading those two sentences.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)