this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
79 points (96.5% liked)

Astronomy

3881 readers
56 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wahming@monyet.cc -1 points 10 months ago (15 children)

What's the point of looking at the stars of we never reach for them? At some point the telescopes have to move into space, we can't stay earthbound forever

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Or we could regulate the reflectivity of satellites. No one is suggesting we shouldn't have satellites. Why don't we do satellites on purpose in a way that still allows us to also do effective astronomy?

[–] beautiful_boater@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They can't make them non-reflective enough to not interrupt really deep observing. Also, that just shifts the problem around. If they are absorbing in the visible, they will likely have huge amounts of blackbody radiation in IR, sub/millimeter, and radio. You would need to make a satellite out of dark matter to not interrupt astronomy.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How about not putting a bunch of janky constantly-needing-replenishment laggy-internet satellites into orbit to begin with where the only real beneficiaries outside of bullshit "remote" excuses is the US military?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)