this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

515 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@selfhosted.forum
6
Should I go with docker containers or continue just using Arch for my home server? (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by Nightwish612@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I mean basically the title. Currently all my services are just running directly on my arch server and it has been working well enough for me and i am super comfortable working with it. A few months back I had a minor crash of the server where the system had become not functional. I was able to recover the server to the point that my services could run but i never got the graphical part of the server going again or nextcloud running.

At this point I'm just considering wiping the os to a fresh one and starting clean to get everything working correctly again. What I'm wondering is, is it worth learning docker and deploying all my services that way or should I just continue with the way i have been doing it for years now?

I will be running the various Arr apps, Emby, NextCloud, Qbit, Homepage?, and probably a few others that i can't recall off the top of my head. Some of the services are accessed of site if that matters at all. I did briefly explore docker in the past but got stuck and my friend pushed me towards straight arch. Now I'm considering giving it another shot but wanted to hear folks here input on the pros and cons of either way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevdogger@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've ran arch for many years in many vms acting as servers. I've never had any more issues with arch than Ubuntu. With any system you can choose you need your keep backups or snap shots

[–] Do_TheEvolution@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here. Its my go-to for years.

Except I had encountered an issue relatively recently, where newest kernel had regression with virtual dvd under esxi hypervisor, causing higher cpu load than typical.

So I took time and switched all my shit to lts kernel, which I should have used from the get-go.

But other than that, which was solved easily by removing dvd or switching kernel, I had zero issues, and even had some deployments where i was updating ~2 years old arch install and it went smoothly...

[–] kevdogger@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

That's unfortunate. Most of time I just use lts kernel. I too am just using servers accessed via ssh and terminal.