this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
LocalLLaMA
3 readers
1 users here now
Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Simple answer is that you can't parallelize LLM work.
It generate answers word-by-word, (or token-by-token to be more precise) so it's impossible to split task into 10-100-1000 different pieces that you could send into this distributed network.
Each word in the LLM answer also serve as part of input to calculate next one, so LLMs are actually counter-distributed systems.
You’d better tell the GPU manufacturers that LLM workloads can’t be parallelized.
The point of Transformers is that the matrix operations can be parallelized, unlike in standard RNNs.
The issue with distributing those parallel operations is that for every partition of the workload, you introduce latency.
If you offload a layer at a time, then you are introducing both the latency of the slowest worker and the network latency, plus the latency of combining results back into one set.
If you’re partitioning at finer grain, eg parts of a layer, then you add even more latency.
Latency can go from 1ms per layer in a monolithic LLM to >1s. That means response times measured in multiple minutes.