this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Self-Hosted Main
515 readers
1 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
For Example
- Service: Dropbox - Alternative: Nextcloud
- Service: Google Reader - Alternative: Tiny Tiny RSS
- Service: Blogger - Alternative: WordPress
We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.
Useful Lists
- Awesome-Selfhosted List of Software
- Awesome-Sysadmin List of Software
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Zammad may tick most of the boxes, though I'm not intimiately familiar with osTickets collaborator fuction. Zammad if others are on To/CC lines then when you "reply all" they stick with the ticket. THough in my install I see that it's not easy to see who's on a ticket. I'd be happy to let you be-bop around my home install sometime as a demo.
It has organizations and they can be selectively shared. Though, I think it's "all users can see all tickets within organization" or "all users can only see their tickets". Not a "users can see theirs, managers only can see organization".
It's a very polished interface, includes SSO integrations, and can be white labeled.
Has email scraping, form submission, and API/webhooks, and some workflow automation funciton.
It also has good agent-side support to have standardized signatures, response templates, and visibility on activity and some OK reporting.
Thanks for the suggestion and for the offer to poke around. We have demo'd Zammad pretty thoroughly and I have spoken with the developers at length about our needs. Unfortunately they exist under some pretty restrictive EU privacy regulations which would make collaboration unweildy (at least as our clients expect it), and the cost of building a patch for us was very prohibitive. They kept refering to what we were asking for as "that collaborator mess", and there was clearly little interest in including collaboration the way our clients use it.
Too bad, because it is a beautiful platform, and it has some increadible funtionality. Just won't work for us though.
They did mention that they are working on 'manager' level users (see thier own tickets and tickets for thier company, but not others).