Artificial Intelligence - News | Events

0 readers

1 users here now

We follow Lemmy’s code of conduct.

Communities

Useful links

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from accurately answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds (fortune.com)

submitted 1 year ago by manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech to c/nev@lemmy.intai.tech

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/1385551

Can we discuss how it's possible that the paid model (gpt4) got worse and the free one (gpt3.5) got better? Is it because the free one is being trained on a larger pool of users or what?

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a hot take. It almost certainly can still do so, it's just been defanged by (arguably necessary) ethics filters. Do you think solving simple math problems in particular is dangerous somehow?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think AI is dangerous. End of discussion.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

If you insist we're done, but I don't see the connection.