this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
167 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3636 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Sorry, but democracy isn't profitable. Later, losers!"

Edit: Should've said it's not profitable enough. As the great Stephanie Sterling often says, corporations don't just want some of the money, they want all of the money.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The weird thing is, it is. These guys who want to knock out the pillars of democracy and sell them as scrap like a bunch of methheads taking apart the load bearing structure of their own parking garage, never set up shop in one of the "after" republics like Russia or wherever. They always wanna come to our places so they be reaping the tasty profitable stable fruits of the democracy they're dismantling.

[–] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, we're at a point where there's a large gap between the profit motive and the system we've basically been using for the last several hundred years (arguably thousands but that's beside the point) to build a somewhat functional society that recognizes human dignity and that people require food and shelter to survive and continue to reproduce and labour.

I think that this marks an unprecedented level of control for an ownership class that's largely out of the regulatory grasp of many nation states (developed or otherwise), and that's why unfettered capitalism seems to be quickly careening towards mass inequality despite surplus resources and many places on earth being reasonably considered to be post-scarcity.

Seems like the myth of constant growth is a religion these days and the mandatory tithes of the common people are no longer able to prop up the church, if you'll excuse a ham-fisted comparison.

If there's no modern New Deal or progressive taxation reform incoming, expect mass defaults and a stock market overcorrection that leads to a significant recession. Not sure when, but probably in the next decade given how even moderately wealthy people (around $100k+/year for a single adult) seem to be legitimately struggling to pay their mortgages.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago

META: You don’t understand. We ARE disinformation

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they had one? never noticed

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Someone else had one, it was great, Facebook bought it, and then they (to their credit) made it available for free to everyone for quite a while, and now they've decided you know what maybe we can have a little disinformation and it's okay, you guys understand, right?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Btw, is Zuck right or left wing?

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe Meta doesn't want to get the Google treatment.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

It sure fucking deserves it. All of these shitty megacorps need to be split up from big tech to ISPs to pharma/healthcare giants that profit off of human suffering.