Technology

59377 readers

5724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

First automatic JPEG-XL cloud service (www.gumlet.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Voyager@psychedelia.ink to c/technology@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

JPEG 's conspicuous issues like lack of transparency, animation, lossless compression and high bit depth support makes it little tough to justify it as leading format for time to come. Various attempts like WebP and AVIF are made (and are supported on modern browsers) to overcome problems of JPEG but they all also suffer some shortcomings of their own. Rather than discussing it, let's see how is the web finally going to change with this new format - JPEG-XL.

JPEG-XL is what we believe is next 20 year format. Why?

It's not one but multiple reasons.

60-70% smaller size compared to similar quality JPEG 😮 Dimension of upto billion pixels allowed (JPEG-XL exclusive) 4099 channels support (JPEG-XL exclusive) Animation support Tile support for large images Progressive decoding (see low resolution image first before full image loads - JPEG-XL and JPEG exclusive) Lossless encoding support Wide-color gamut support Extremely fast for both encoding and decoding (WebP and AVIF are much slower) Royalty free 🤘 This basically means anything that a photographer, developer or animation creator can think of, it's supported by this format. Everyone stays happy and gets to use one format for everything.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Lightrider@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 year ago

Google is desperately trying to kill it in favor of their own webp but apple just enabled it standard in safari. Fuckingcapitalists

[–] gonta@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's my first time hearing about JPEG-XL. What's the file format name? '*.jpeg-xl'?

Can I create it with Adobe Photoshop?

[–] Deebster@lemmyrs.org 19 points 1 year ago

I can only answer the first part: .jxl

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No clue about photoshop, but you can in GIMP, for whatever that is worth lol

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No layer support? Or can that be faked by using 4 channel-chunks?

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Probably easier to fake with frames of animation, but JXL is not a replacement for .PSD or .XCF files and I do not know what usecase layers would be for besides authoring

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In my company’s product, we allow users to place images into a composition and alter the colors (like tinting/colorize in Photoshop, so only globally). When doing that, the outline of the drawn image should not change color, and also there might be multiple color areas (think an image of a house where the walls have a separate color from the chimneys).

To do separate full-image manipulation, we need multiple layers. Right now they’re just a tilemap with the layers next to each other, but that doesn’t work for repeating patterns.