this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
137 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
397 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ecoenginefutures@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The reason for a lot of these subsidies is the dependence of other economies on oil. We need more open source solar and nuclear tech to make the planet resilient, then we can throw oil out of the window.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

then we can throw oil out of the window

Don't do that that's pollution, do you want Captain Planet to take you down to zero?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is not how subsidies work. Subsidies just artigically lower the price for something, while increasing the price for other things(you need money to pay the subsidies). So with the economy dependent on oil, cutting subidies would just increase oil prices, while lowering the price for alternatives.

We need to cut subsidies and deploy the alternatives quickly enough. We have most of the tech and for the most part supply chaines to make it work.

[–] ecoenginefutures@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Very well articulated!

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 6 points 1 month ago

Or, you know, healthcare.