this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
152 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

walz signed state legislation joining minnesota to npvic. it should be no surprise that this is his position.

it's not part of the dnc platform at this time. probably because it's in the state's hands right now (getting more on-board with the idea via npvic); and a big huge shakeup in congress (amendment-passing majorities) and state governments (enough to ratify those amendments) would be needed to do anything at the federal level anyway.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 26 points 1 month ago

The low population states have the most to lose if the Electoral College is overturned. Because they are disproportionately powerful under the EC, any candidate that threatens that power could lose support needed to win under... the EC.

If people had more proclivity for voting for the greater good over their personal, narrow interests, a lot more wonderful things would happen.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

Waltz had an opinion that is not the official party position.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The American system is not designed to be kind to those who want to change the American system. It's cool that he even said it, even though it was just an off the cuff sound bite

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The system is designed so that mob rule doesn't happen. Unfortunately it's also got the effect of allowing the majority to be ruled by the minority. It's a system that's difficult to fix. Realistically we need RCV first.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The electoral college was a compromise with slavers. Since 1800, more than 700 proposals to change or get rid of it have been introduced, and we're the only constitutional republic in the 21st century that still uses one. Direct democracy works fine.

RCV would be an improvement, but with FPTP the bar is a tripping hazard in hell. I'd prefer something like STAR voting or some implementation of Condorcet, with mandatory voting and a day off to do it.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0065

There was one difficulty however of a serious nature attending an immediate choice by the people. The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of the Negroes. The substitution of electors obviated this difficulty and seemed on the whole to be liable to fewest objections.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Well it should be.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for USA Today:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/09/tim-walz-electoral-college/75584019007/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support