this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
647 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58761 readers
5340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet another reason to never use Chrome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underthesign@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (45 children)

Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I'm personally very bored with my kids' schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won't open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What you're talking about is webcompat and is a very complicated issue. Also I've talked to some Mozilla devs who gave me multiple examples of Chromium rendering something wrong, and they'd have to intentionally break Firefox to render it incorrectly too, just so the end user would get a more consistent experience. Of course these issues happen more and more when things are only tested for one browser.

[–] yikerman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This is Chromium monopoly. At this time instead of W3C standards, Chromium itself becomes the standard.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

Maybe there could be some sort of compatibility flag in Firefox which detects non-standard pages designed for Chrome. We could call it... hmm... something like Quirks Mode?

[–] kava@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I can't think of a single example where a web page doesn't work on FF.

if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups

Lol. I remember when FF was the most popular browser.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on

Care to share some examples Firefox has trouble with? The only issues I have with websites is due to my aggressive use of Noscript.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay that's fine, but when websites are effectively writing

if user_agent_string != [chromium]
     break;

It doesn't really matter how good compatibility is. I've had websites go from nothing but a "Firefox is not supported, please use Chrome" splash screen to working just fine with Firefox by simply spoofing the user agent to Chrome. Maybe some feature was broken, but I was able to do what I needed. More often than not they just aren't testing it and don't want to support other browsers.

The more insidious side of this is that websites will require and attempt to enforce Chrome as adblocking gets increasingly impossible on them, because it aligns with their interests. It's so important for the future of the web that we resist this change, but I think it's too late.

The world wide web is quickly turning into the dark alley of the internet that nobody is willing to walk down.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 day ago

As a developer, I can foresee websites using features other than navigator.userAgent to detect Chrome, because it's easy to change its value. For example: for now, navigator.getBattery is available only in Chromium, and it doesn't need permissions to be checked for its existence through typeof navigator.getBattery === 'function' (also, the function seems to be perfectly callable without user intervention, enabling additional means of fingerprinting). While it's easy to spoof userAgent, it's not as easy to "mock" unsupported APIs such as navigator.getBattery through Firefox.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works...

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

Almost like it does work on Firefox but for some reason they don't want you using it. Honestly it's so damn weird, why do that? Is there some incentive for them?

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago

Firefox can't fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

You can help by reporting sites that don't work for you.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can you send me an example? I don't think I ever really encountered those sites and I use FF almost exclusively for ~20 years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 day ago

Honestly I'd say the Internet isn't safe, and it's because of Google, fuck you Google. It's not just the wine I've been drinking, it's true dammit.

[–] Mobiledecay@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Welcome back to Firefox everyone! At least if you're as old or older than I. 😁

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it's more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they're just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

[–] karpintero@lemmy.world 165 points 2 days ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 148 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We kept Firefox alive for you all these years. You're welcome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 94 points 2 days ago (43 children)

Finally made the switch to Firefox just 2 days ago. Great so far.

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›