this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10181 readers
82 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The column actually backs up the hed, as abhorrent as it is at first, second and third glances.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 8 points 14 hours ago

ive heard some people theorizing his nomination is also a distraction from Tulsi Gabbards nomination . Gaetz is monopolizing most of the conversation around the nominations when he has a shaky chance at being confirmed at all. Gabbard is way more likely to cause serious damage to national security.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I expected to be offended and/or astonished by a ridiculously transparent bit of sanewashing here, but you know... I think I actually might agree.

It does seem to be a valid point - Gaetz is a grotesquely destructive demagogue and Trump sycophant, but he's also a buffoon, and that's undoubtedly better than a grotesquely destructive demagogue and Trump sycophant who's also a smart and devious and highly skilled politician.

Huh...

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 18 hours ago

I mean, it also forced him to resign from Congress and he's also unlikely to survive the confirmation process, especially if the ethics report is released...

Either way, that's a good outcome I suppose.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago

This logic is going to keep getting trotted out throughout the trump presidency. In some cases it'll be true. In this case I think it could be. In many cases it won't be , simply because destroying things is easier than building things and they're mostly there to destroy .