this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
58 points (92.6% liked)

movies

1779 readers
387 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Reposting my relevent meme

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The article headline contradicts the article, which states multiple companies did see it and made offers that apparently were not high enough to meet the arbitrary floor that the Warner Brothers executive who did not see the movie had set.

People like Zazlov or whatever his name is can't accept being wrong so there is zero chance of the movie ever coming out as long as he is in charge, even if someone offered more.

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

IIRC, it was decided it was going to be an insurance loss/payout, even though it is an allegedly good movie.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 6 points 3 hours ago

I hold out that one day this will get released or rather leaked. I hope it hasn't been deleted.

The closet we'll get to seeing at right now is this crew reel showing off the hard work that went into bringing the Looney Tunes world to live action.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The fact the Zaslev et. al. are over DC Studios led by James Gunn is frightening in an existential way. Non-risk-takers, while understandable in a CEO, doesn't produce great, it tends toward the average.

Not only that, but this pathetic, grasping scheme of letting creatives make something and shit-canning it for a tax write-off is going to lose trust for the studio, and they will only have access to lesser, or mechanical, for-profit filmmakers.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

they will only have access to lesser, or mechanical, for-profit filmmakers.

that would achieve their goal