this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

28380 readers
1407 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With Alphabet taking a hard stance against adblockers I’m wondering if devs are starting to put some focus on PeerTube? It could use some TLC. I feel like it’s a sleeping giant of the Fediverse.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd really love if PeerTube could become a standard, but it needs a catalogue of back content, better discoverability, and most of all, to offer financial incentive to move over. As much as I hate to say it, I think something crypto backed like odysee/lbry is more likely to become major.
There's no payout for putting videos on peertube, and there's not enough audience to get sponsorships. If you really want to make peertube a success, that's where it has to start. No amount of technology will make people go from making some money to making none money.

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 7 points 1 year ago

The whole landscape changes, of course, when Youtube gets put behind a paywall or goes under. This is a when, and not an if situation; video streaming with perpetual archival is not a working business model, and YouTube's never churned out a profit in the 18 years its been online. But twitch and tiktok will likely be where creators move to. I don't see large swaths of people moving to even odysee in the current online climate.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

To contrast with the popular sentiment here, it seems to me like the missing piece in the peertube puzzle is actually creator coops as an organization. I think these probably look a little like some of the more creator based streaming services out right now (think dropout and nebula) but could just as easily be organized around things like influencer houses once there's a clear model to emulate.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 6 points 1 year ago

At this point YT is more like TV: you make some content, YT uses it to show ads, you get part of the profits. If you just want to share some content with people there are many ways to do it. If you want earn money doing it there's really just the ad supported big social networks. Open source solutions have their uses but can't really compete with YT.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very often progress is blocked by culture, not software. When we coordinate to discover our shared interests we can better target our action to change this culture in our communities and achieve greater software freedom.

[–] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This is well said and beautifully put

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Framasoft has 1 full-time dev dedicated to it, there is a roadmap of upcoming features but honestly, hosting costs is what is preventing most youtubers from trying it