this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
664 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
5059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean... We do sometimes. πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

For example I have ADHD, autism and BPD.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When people talk about "LGBTQ+ people have mental illness" they don't mean any of that.

They mean "being LGBTQ+ is a mental illness, and these people first need to be attempted to be cured, if that fails then need to be removed from society".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

I thought it's widely-agreed that gender dysphoria is a mental illness. The debate lies in how to treat itβ€”try to realign the body with the mind or the mind with the body.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Zeezee already has a great reply. I'd also like to add that gender dysphoria isn't the same as being trans, it's possible to be trans and not have dysphoria

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What I want to know is who thought it was a good idea to give the kid who ate rocks at recess for attention an international platform. Hmm?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

Is this a meme I don't know?

Zuck is extraordinarily intelligent. You don't get into Harvard as a non legacy eating rocks.

Nor did anyone give it to him. He took it by cheating the partners that made Facebook grow in it's early years.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel conflicted. On one hand, people can regulate themselves, and Facebook becoming a bigoted cesspit may bring more people to a moderated Fediverse.

On the other hand, these major platforms having such user monopoly and influence can cause unfettered hate speech to breed violence.

I’m conflicted about the idea that an insidious for-profit megacorporation should be expected to uphold a moral responsibility to prevent violence; their failure to do so might be a necessary wake-up call that ultimately strips them of that problematic influence. Thoughts?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think the big reason they are allowing it is because they got to cut the entire cost of having moderation with an external vendor. Not because they have an agenda or anything. Its pure dollars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] b1tstremist0@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

So what I see is, Meta first creates the problem of trans-metaverse by super aggressive inorganic promotion and then makes it even worse by cutting the expenses on such useless promotion. XD

L for all those who fell for it. Society eats you up (not sexually, keep your pants on) for getting mentally manipulated so easily.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Okay πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

EDIT They can say whatever they want. But so can you. So where's the problem?

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The problem is that people are vulnerable to disinformation and now there is little to no pushback on these platforms.

In a world where people are expert critical thinkers with no biases and perfect rationality it wouldn't matter, but that isn't how people work in the slightest.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

The problem is that people want to censor what they don't want to see for others.

"If I don't like it, then neither should you."

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

On facebook and Twitter and others, we cannot say whatever we want. Truth is suppressed while disinformation is allowed. Saying LGBTQ+ people are mentally ill is allowed but mentioning even the word "cisgender" is suppressed. LGBTQ+ content will get removed for being "sexual content" but straight content that's equivalent will be allowed. LGBTQ+ people face repeated harrassment on these platforms, sometimes to the level of terrorism; if they don't feel safe posting about LGBTQ+ topics, they cannot say whatever they want. Hell, they get doxed but there's rarely repercussions for the doxers.

Imagine if I spread lies about you, call you a pedophile, doxx you and then someone SWATs you; would you still feel like you can say anything?

Equality and fairness does not exist on these social platforms.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί