this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
139 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar and wind energy could fulfill energy demand 10-fold, Oxford study finds::undefined

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

A change in thinking about energy needs to happen to truly understand why Wind and Solar and a bit of storage is enough. You have to accept that at times there will be overproduction of power because storing it to hit exact use capacity isn't cost effective. Some storage makes sense, but its much cheaper to have more capacity.

What I think will happen in the future once we reach the point this is how most energy comes is more people will be on Octopus like smart energy schemes where you might get paid for using electricity and there will be companies that use this to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. We are approaching a world of energy excess but only at certain times and there are opportunities to use that energy for the right reasons to reverse the damage we have done with CO2 emissions.

[–] this_is_router@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

if it's to cheap, the market wont be able to profit enough, so I'm pretty sure they will find a way to squeeze us dry anyway

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only thing is that they take up a hell of a lot more space and are a lot more unsightly than "dirty" power plants. Nuclear power is great, the only quandary is what do we do with the spent fuel rods since they're radioactive for about another 10,000 years.

Nuclear meltdowns like what happened at Chernobyl and Fukushima wouldn't happen in the US. The only nuclear accident we've had was Three Mile Island which is nothing compared to the above two. Also terrorists attacking nuclear power plants wouldn't happen either because the walls of pretty much every reactor in the US are like 30 feet thick of reinforced concrete, they can withstand direct hits of a 747 or a missile (my dad worked on the one here in NJ), if an ICBM with a nuclear payload is targeting a nuclear plant, we're already fucked.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO wind turbines are beautiful

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One may look nice, 10 or 20 though? That's pushing it

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You know what they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder!