this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40388 readers
173 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 1 points 2 years ago

The Metaverse died because they tried to monetize it before it's even a thing. Buy a virtual plot of land? With crypto and NFTs? Hell no!

VR Chat exists and it, and it's free.

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is the wildest take I've heard. People don't trust meta because it's Facebook, because it's Zuckerberg. We've all seen what they do with companies they acquire (I used to be an Oculus rift owner).We've all seen how poorly they handle data, seems like there is a data breach every year.

Hell, when I was an Oculus rift owner I worked inside of Virtual Desktop some days. I'd argue that Meta killed my desire to work in VR.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the article is accurate, and they make a good argument for the fact that Silicon Valley is anti-fun. Even without all the data tracking they still think people want to make money playing games, which is ridiculously out of touch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think this article makes reasonable sense. Also that quote from Spez is so disheartening. Glad I'm not on reddit anymore

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.net 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think it was ever born to have died. I think they grossly overestimated how much this tech would improve

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dear tech developers, if you are listening please put VR projects on the back burner. They are an interesting future technology but the currently possible technology that people would adopt if it were economical to do so is AR. A simple heads up display with an integrated personal assistant has enormous potential in both personal and business uses right now if it was reasonably priced and reliable. You could replace cell phones.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

AR has a huge battery life and size problem. The amount of video processing that thing would need to do to be useful, would result in an enormous device with an hour or two of battery life. Rendering it useless for any real world consumer application.

On top of that it has a gigantic privacy and surveillance problem.

And if that wouldn't be enough, what the heck are you going to do with it? Everything an AR headset could do, you can do today with your phone already. There is very little need to wear that functionality on your head all the time.

For some rare business use cases it can make sense, that's why Microsoft Hololens is still around, but even they struggle to finding any areas where it makes it past the "nice idea" stage and actually into a working product.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›