this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
300 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

61081 readers
2471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The push comes as India seeks greater regulatory control over global tech companies. The initiative would require manufacturers to include the government's GOV.in app store and related apps like BHIM, DigiLocker, VoterID on smartphones sold from India.

Beyond pre-installation, they also requested that their apps be available for download outside the company's app stores from third-party sources without triggering "untrusted source" warnings.

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

my country doesn't really do this

[–] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I don't see it necessarely as a bad thing. I would rather have my gov id app (for taxes, id and driving licence, public services info) on my phone when i buy it, rather than candy crush and other fucking bloatware. I think it would also help a lot of non-tech savy users set up their phones quickly.

Second of all, gov ID apps having their own store on the side is good. Them being only available on google's store makes it so that if you want to access public services from your state you have to go through google (?), it is clearly not acceptable by a government standpoint, It is even worse than a monopoly.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you want apple to help pre installing something so you didn't depend on Apple when users actually want to use the app. Can you tell me how this makes sense?

[–] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its not about nicely asking apple for "help" pre installing some apps, it is forcing them to open up the os to different software sources.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub -1 points 4 days ago

I really don’t mind the concept of preinstalled applications as long as they can be easily removed.

[–] wavegor34@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago

Good morning sirs

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›