this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
523 points (94.7% liked)

Asklemmy

49665 readers
753 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Your push would travel at the speed of sound in the stick. You could think of hitting a pipe with a hammer, the sound of the hit would travel at the speed of sound, same is true for you pushing the stick.

[โ€“] ladicius@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What about the mass of that stick? Inertial doesn't care for your little silly games.

load more comments (1 replies)

why wouldn't this work

because bullets are faster than whatever the fuck speed stickman is achieving
and even bullets are slower than light

[โ€“] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't see this mentioned in any of the other comments: the repulsion between atoms that causes the movement to propagate through the stick is actually communicated via photons. So your push really generates the same kind of particles that your light torch is generating, and they travel at the same speed. Except in the stick it is slowed down by repeated absorption and excitation by the electrons of the atoms.

[โ€“] Ludrol@szmer.info 2 points 5 months ago
[โ€“] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 5 months ago
[โ€“] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Nah, I prefer using quantum spookiness for that. Send a steady stream of entangled particles to the other person on the moon first. Any time you do something to the particles on Earth, the ones on the Moon are affected also. The catch is that this disentangles them, so you have only a few limited uses. This is why you want a constant stream of them being entangled.

[โ€“] pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Any time you do something to the particles on Earth, the ones on the Moon are affected also

The no-communication theorem already proves that manipulating one particle in an entangled pair has no impact at al on another. The proof uses the reduced density matrices of the particles which capture both their probabilities of showing up in a particular state as well as their coherence terms which capture their ability to exhibit interference effects. No change you can make to one particle in an entangled pair can possibly lead to an alteration of the reduced density matrix of the other particle.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ