this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
456 points (99.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

16766 readers
1004 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Durandal@lemmy.today 50 points 1 day ago (6 children)

IIRC GOG is actually partnered with HeroicLauncher... so.. it's semi official to use that... and better UX.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Affiliate links are not business partnerships. Does Heroic have anything more than that with GOG?

EDIT: The answer is no, GOG is not partnered with Heroic Games Launcher.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

~~Gog funds Heroic.~~

I actually think it's a fairly decent compromise (although I prefer Lutris), since Gog is clearly not interested in paying to maintain a Linux port.

EDIT: Wrong(ish)! See below.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Gog funds Heroic.

By some other means than affiliate link payouts? I'm not aware of any such arrangement, but if one exists, can you link some details about it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Better UX until you have to download or update a game… there is an open bug report where it just doesn't progress but keeps starting new processes until you‘re OOM. Still no fix in months, I've had to boot into Windows for every single update. Really not that good of an UX.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

Are you updating Linux games from Windows??

How does your Windows install open the ext4/btrfs file system your Linux games are stored on?

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

Bad engineering

[–] iusearchbtw@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

heroic has no download throttling, very annoying for shared/shitty networks and large games

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you're on Linux, you have a lot more options to affect the system. You could try running Heroic Launcher through trickle: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/34116/how-can-i-limit-the-bandwidth-used-by-a-process

Ideally this would be implemented on the client side, i.e. Heroic Launcher, but there seems to some challenges in making that happen: https://github.com/Heroic-Games-Launcher/HeroicGamesLauncher/issues/597

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I'd put that as a feature request honestly, they'll probably add that in at some point

[–] hellofriend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't call HGL a better UX. It straight up doesn't work for me. When it did, I couldn't get games to install or update and had to DL manually in browser, install into some other Wine prefix, and then manually move the files to an HGL-generated prefix. The UI looks nicer but it's not nearly as straightforward as Galaxy's. It's more like Lutris in its complexity, though I imagine there's no easy way around that.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Better UX is a big word, as any unofficial launcher it kinda sucks because it doesn’t have a specific feature set. Besides, first party support is always better

That's neat to learn

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

This is what keeps me on Steam, along with Steam Input and Big Picture

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is UI for GOG? We have a Heroic Game Launcher. It can work with GOG.

[–] formerlytomato@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get into this on the post, but AFAIK community-built solutions such as Heroic and Lutris aren't exactly the same, with a lot of Galaxy's selling points being the cloud features such as save data sync and a friends list system for online play.

Different people may or may not find uses for these features, but it's still worth discussing IMO.

[–] eldain@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imho, if they decide to put effort into Linux, I'd rather see them put dev resources into heroic to add these features than to make just another client. They are late to the market, that would make the most of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Because GOG doesn't want to support it. They'd rather the community do it.

[–] DioEgizio@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

You can use heroic I guess...

[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's an open-source CLI client to download GOG games, lgogdownloader. It's packaged in Debian.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are also GUI launchers that can download from GOG:

https://sharkwouter.github.io/minigalaxy/

https://lutris.net/about

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Because cdpr is a joke. Like did you see cyberpunks release? All they care is about money they showed that with their rushed job. I haven't claimed any free games on GOG because you have to sign up for their newsletter in order to claim the game. I still get spammed with emails from GOG even after unsubscribing after I receive every single email. At this point of just marked em' as spam.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 day ago
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›