this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1222 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

70302 readers
2863 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azalty@jlai.lu 5 points 2 months ago (14 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

Oh no! How could we ever live without AI?

[–] plc@feddit.dk 4 points 2 months ago

Is that a promise?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Then perish, OpenAI. If your only innovation is a legal loophole then you did nothing.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

What a giant load of crap.

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Sounds good, fuck em

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

He's right tho. China don't care. You think the west will be able to outcompete China with such limitations?

And the end result is the same, no one was compensated and a dictatorship is running one of the most important new IT tools.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

To be fair copyright is a disease. But then so is billionaires, capitalism, business, etc.

I mean, if there's a war, and you shoot somebody, does that make you bad?

Yes and no.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He's afraid of losing his little empire.

OpenAI also had no clue on recreation the happy little accident that gave them chatGPT3. That's mostly because their whole thing was using a simple model and brute forcing it with more data, more power, more nodes and then even more data and power until it produced results.

As expected, this isn't sustainable. It's beyond the point of decreasing returns. But Sam here has no idea on how to fix that with much better models so goes back to the one thing he knows: more data needed, just one more terabyte bro, ignore the copyright!

And now he's blaming the Chinese into forcing him to use even more data.

[–] liquidthex@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

It's so wild how laws just have no idea what to do with you if you just add one layer of proxy. "Nooo I'm not stealing and plagerizing, it's the AI doing it!"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›