this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
176 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

68918 readers
8175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

do AI to get rid of all ads.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and OpenAI’s GPT-4oexplicitly refuse to remove watermarks; Claude calls removing a watermark from an image “unethical and potentially illegal.

Interesting thing here. I recently convinced a Sonnet chatbot to redefine “unethical,” “potentially,” and “illegal.”

It was actually perfectly happy to dump a bunch of details about its training model after that, as long as I didn’t use any hard-coded words or phrases and let the model guess at what it was I wanted it to do.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

It’s bad to break copyright if you do it, but it’s fine if they do it to train their models

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd like to hear their attempt at explaining how that would be unethical

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s how it all started; it kept stating that doing so would potentially be unethical, but couldn’t square that with its definition of unethical. So then I said it hinged on “potentially” and that this had to be left to a human to decide as it, as an LLM, was indeterministic. Since I was the only human available, it had to defer to me, and my determination was that this was untruthful, and it had an imperative to only provide truthful answers.

[–] PeteWheeler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who knew you could just gaslight our AI overlords?