I'm curious what they're actually talking about banning that the article refers to as "AI". Unless you're talking about hypothetical future tech or the flavor of the week like LLMs or stable diffusion, it's pretty much a meaningless term.
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
129 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
59402 readers
4094 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Hopefully it's an entire blanket ban on target decisions. AI has a ton of uses, especially if dumb LLM stuff is included. Human-groomed algorithms won't be keeping up. It'll be necessary to use them, but they shouldn't ever decide who gets boomboomed.
Oh dear god I hope nobody was planning on giving ChatGPT nuclear bombs.
European countries are already working on AI fighter jets and drones.
I think that is more like an advanced auto pilot which can also steer missiles to their target but only if fired by the human. The OP article says they're banning AI from making the decision to fire the weapon.
deleted
Its cheaper, easier and still leaves room for ai guided ammunition