this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
986 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

55294 readers
1300 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 136 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not just the size constraint. The power usage is significant...

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (10 children)

If you have the lid closed, you're looking at 3 to 15 watts to have a laptop running in the background doing some basic server shit.

Maybe a little more under high load, but those are going to be intermittent and not constant.

I'm just saying it's not that much more electricity usage, and the recycling more than offsets the CO2.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 day ago

If you have the lid closed, you’re looking at 3 to 15 watts to have a laptop running in the background doing some basic server shit.

Not all laptops make effective use of power with the lid closed, sadly. Not saying this as a correction, but for others to know that they need to make sure these settings are available in the bios of the system they are buying.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Laptop performance when closed is quite variable, but depending on where you live, each 10W of idle consumption 24/7/365 could cost you somewhere around $20/yr (assumes @$0.20/kWh, YMMV). This isn't overwhelming on it's own, but it is "cost difference between a junked laptop and a Raspberry Pi" kinda money.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And you are often paying 140-200 for a pi nowadays to make it have the same usability as a laptop (pi, power supply, sata hat, data drive because SD cards simply fail after a while under server IO) while you can get cheap used laptops for 0-100.

So unless you are running it for more than half a decade (which rarely happens with selfhosters for a main server), you are probably spending more in total on the pi.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The day i can fit the power of a computer capable of emulating the switch 1 in a gameboy shell will be glorious.

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We must be pretty close on that by now, I can emulate a number of Switch 1 games surprisingly OK (not amazing, just OK) on my S21!

load more comments (1 replies)

You probably could with a phone

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 89 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Get them from where? I always read about these basically-free computers but have yet to see one

[–] undead@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Facebook marketplace, kjiji, etc

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Everyone here thinks their shit tier 2018 laptop is made of gold or something.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago

'Gaming laptop, only used occasionally. Been sitting around for a while because my kid's got a new hobby. £1,200 no offers. I know what I've got'

The pictured laptop has a Centrino sticker on it and looks like it's been used to dig a garden

[–] not_amm@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Same here in México, a lot of people think their dual core Intel from 2011 (and even older than that) is still worth more than +$100USD. Even worse, companies usually want to resell devices to recover some of the cost, so even that option is kind of expensive. I'm waiting for some friends that can buy company devices for cheap so they can resell them to me for cheap too lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I wouldn't touch Facebook with a 10' ethernet cable. Haven't heard of kjiji, I'll have to check it out.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You're missing out, Facebook marketplace is THE place to buy local secondhand goods for dirt cheap without getting scammed. You do need an account but you don't need to install anything, and the payments are not done through FB

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did someone fall asleep on the keyboard when they came up with kjiji?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hyacin@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mostly agree, and did the same with my second gen lab build - instead of shiny new NUCs like I had used round 1, I bought old off lease Dell Xeon boxes. SO MANY PROS -

  • Got them up to 14c/28t each
  • They can take GPUs and actually do heavy transcoding/ML work
  • They can take up to like, 128GB of memory, which is GREAT when they're all hypervisors

The downsides can't be denied though -

  • Even without the GPUs and beefed up CPUs, they are power hogs - the CPU alone uses more than an ENTIRE NUC
  • They run HOT
  • They run LOUD

The same holds true for off-lease SFF stuff, Lenovo and the likes ...

So while reuse/repurpose is absolutely of the utmost importance, no question - when it comes to technology and how quickly it advances and miniaturizes, a thorough and logical pros/cons list is often required.

I'd add another option though - if you do need what a Pi brings to the table - do you really need a shiny new Pi 5? Is it possible a used Pi 3 or Pi 4 would do the trick, and check the reuse box?

[–] AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

The power aspect is a lot bigger of a factor than I would have thought. I had an old computer I was going to use as a server for Foundry that I could keep up all the time, but when I measured its wattage and did the math, it would cost me $20 a month to keep on. A pi costs like $2 to keep running, so it paid for itself pretty quick

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] polle@feddit.org 60 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Where are these cheap e waste laptops with gpio and actually low power?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] loveknight@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Or get a used thin client (e. g. HP T620, T630, T640 or Dell Wyse 5070). Cost: ~40-100$. Biggest advantage: Passive cooling, i. e. they're absolutely quiet.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago

Wanna get something like this and a large SSD going forward. Make a silent NAS out of it, and have it in my bedroom without issues.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I dislike posts like this. Technology moves quickly. PIs are great for hobby electronics where you need a little computer. Want a cheap computer to run a few things 24/7 and know what you're doing? Pi it is. You don't need to run containers on a pi because you have the skills to install the dependencies manually. They cost pennies to run 24/7.

I think of pis as beefed-up calculators. I have made lots of money using a pi zero running code I needed to run 24/7. Code I developed myself.

Having an old laptop with outdated parts taking up lots of space, weighing a lot, and having components like fans, keyboard, and mousepad most-likely soon dying and needing replacing is an additional concern you don't want.

Someone below saying use an old laptop if you're living with parents and don't pay the electricity bill is a bit lame. Do your part for the world. Someone will be paying for it.

Ultimately, use what you want but if you're just starting with servers, use a virtual machine on your computer and log in to it. You can dick about with it as much as you want, and reset back to a working state in seconds.

[–] gamma@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah, theres a lot of old old laptops which make no sense to run. But there's a growing crop of more recent used devices that are only being sold off because they don't support Windows 11, and the power efficiency story changes there. The OOP mentions "8.1 lappies"; my main laptop has a 15W 8th gen which is only in the last year starting to feel less appropriate for desktop use. (And honestly, a RAM and storage bump will probably get me another couple years.)

For environmental concerns, youve got to tax new devices with manufacturing costs as well.

100% agree about VMs though.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Pi's are ARM-based, which still to this day limits the scope of their applicability.

Also, you should absolutely inspect a laptop before buying. Many, if not most, of old laptops will run just fine for the next few years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think this really depends on the model they're eyeballing because the Pi5 is frankly ridiculous for the price and has absurd power requirements (5V5A USB?). I wouldn't recommend one of these unless you have a specific need like a certain hat or the GPIO pins. You can get a Dell micro Optiplex for less money and have a full fledged i5 or i7 processor with similar power usage.

Plus the RPi Foundation exposed themselves as the greedy bastards they are during COVID which is yet another reason to turn your back on them.

For something like a Pi Zero, maybe go for it, but there are similar devices out there from other companies too.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tasankovasara@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The only caveat here is the fire-hazard non-removable lithium batteries.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is, in my mind, one of the benefits of laptops over micro computers: integrated UPS. Even an old, degraded battery will probably get you a couple of hours with the screen off.

IME, power consumption is going to be worse overall, for any laptop likely to be in the recycle bin, it's probably double the consumption of an ARM SBC. The integrated UPS and usually decent power conditioning of the power supply saves you more money with a laptop. Plus, keyboard and screen for emergencies - I just generally expect that, over there life of a micro I'm going to have to drag out and plug in a spare keyboard, mouse, and monitor because something in a device, or an upgrade, or BIOS flash, is preventing a boot.

There are a lot of good reasons to use laptops instead of SBCs, if you don't mind the extra power draw and (as she says) don't have size requirements.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Replacement is usually removing 6-10 screws and prying the case with a guitar pick or old credit card. There is most likely a disassembly video on youtube. Batteries from aliexpress or the like are usually cheap (although probably more expensive than the computer). Depending on the application, the "built-in UPS" can be nice.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Low power and arm architecture are big differentiators between Pi and laptops.

I totally agree recycle laptops where possible, but they're generally noisier and less energy efficient plus the battery degrades over time and is a fire risk.

They're not necessairly a good fit for always-on server or service type uses comparef to a small board like Raspberry Pi. But a cheap or free second hand laptop is definitely good for tweaking, testing and trying our projects.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's low power that is still making arm small computers popular. It's impossible to get a pc down into the 2-5 Watt power consumption range and over time it's the electrical costs that add up. I would suggest the RPI5 is the thing to get because it's expensive for what it is and more performance is available from other options supported by armbian.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 day ago (11 children)

The power constraints are more important to most than the size constraints honestly.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You lose the I/O and power efficiency is no comparison. You can get better power efficiency and sometimes some I/O with an old router and OpenWRT, but you'll be in the class of a Beagle Bone and a much harder learning curve. I've never managed to get a sensor or peripheral working on some old laptop's SPI or I2C buses like how easy it is on a Rπ.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Rockchip boards are way more efficient than Pis

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

raspberries were viable while those were cheap. I think I got a 3b (plus?) in pre-deficit years for like $25 second-hand AND I got some shitty case AND a microSD card AND it could run off of a somewhat normal USB phone charger. so using those instead of a 10 year old decommissioned desktop was an awesome value proposition.

nowadays, those devices are encroaching on trip-digits territory and the power adapter is like $30. the computing power you can buy for a third of that designates raspberries exclusively for niche use cases where footprint and power consumption are primary considerations.

not to mention fake Jason Statham just rubs me the wrong way, like all them "visionaries". he makes this sound like he's the head of Feed Africa or something, on a noble mission to save humanity and whatnot.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›