this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
562 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
5522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tekchip@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, what would be the appeal compared to XMPP?

[–] Tekchip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will preface this with, I may be wrong, but as I understand it xmpp is just a protocol. One that, unless it's been revised, imparts no encryption at all. Signal, and Session, are full architectures that enable all of the afrementioned features from my initial post including server and client.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything you might use relies on a protocol down the stack. XMPP happens to be the only one to date that is an internet standard (IETF), is extensible by design (past/present and future use-cases can be build into it, what makes it still relevant 25 years later), is federated (but not P2P, a good trade-off for mobile usage), has a diverse/multi-partite ecosystem of client and server implementers (sustainable and resilient), and is deployed successfully at scale (on billion of devices).

unless it’s been revised, imparts no encryption

Today's XMPP uses the same E2EE as Signal/WhatsApp/Matrix/… XMPP had end-to-end encryption 10 years before Signal was invented

[–] Tekchip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure, now which pre-existing piece of xmpp based software checks all the feature boxes as noted by both Signal adherents and myself regarding Session? Are you implying the lay user code their own? If that exists you could have just linked to it rather than engage in whatever this is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

20M USD for 50 employees? ~400+k per employee is nuts!

There are European engineers working at private companies for less 20% (1/5th) of that - if even that! They aren't worse than their American counterparts. Signal could increase their team sizes by at least 30%, maybe even 50% if they hired engineers and other employees from Europe.

If signal paid 100k for European engineers to work on opensource software, mate, they'd have absolute no problems retaining them. I personally don't know a single engineer earning 100k on the European mainland. Not one.

Edit: seriously, wtf. I'm all for paying employees well and it's great that Signal has a dedicated workforce, but 400k? I'm fine canceling my donation. My jaw is still on the floor.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›