this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
686 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

71884 readers
4883 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 178 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

USA could have spent money developing an electrified economy but the republicans are focusing on bringing back coal mining and reshoring shoe manufacturing instead.

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 37 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Which kind of blows my mind. Coal miners should love EVs. There was a story in the news a few years ago about how nice it was for the miners to help someone in an EV, as if they should be mortal enemies.

Non-EV cars don't run on coal, they run on gasoline. EVs on the other hand can run on coal, natural gas, solar, wind, you name it - and still are more energy efficient than cars burning gasoline. In a sane world, coal miners would be throwing their support behind electric vehicles. The utility companies seem to understand this, but seems like the support hasn't made its way up the supply chain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't exclusively a problem of the new administration, or the previous. All administrations since the late 20th century have been compliant in allowing the offshoring of most industry

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 17 hours ago

It’s not just industry. Now they’re killing the development of skills and knowledge in engineering (hardware, software) and design

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago

Especially when you see some of the tech being rocked in Asian cities

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 10 points 19 hours ago

The problem is systemic, it didn’t start with Trump. He’s just way more flagrant.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

Again. They already enshrined "billionaires get all the money" in the one legislative victory of trumps first term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

But… but… those good ol’ days felt so good! We need to relive those days!

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 17 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

I own BYD and it is a great car. Very pleased with it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

as customers switch to Chinese EVs

Sure. That's the reason.

[–] killabeezio@lemmy.zip 73 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

I don't think that's what they meant. I think they are just saying that people are still buying EVs, but they are just going to Chinese and other manufacturers instead of buying a Tesla. The article specifically calls out the stupid shit Elon has been doing.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 21 hours ago

Which is important because about a year ago the headlines were saying EV sales were collapsing. In fact, it was just Tesla having less market share of new EVs sold because other manufacturers got off their ass.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hitler was "incendiary" and "political" but I think there's a four-letter word so much better, so much more concise, that this wording is actual disinformation.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Journalists do Nazi what you're talking about.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

CNBC didn't here. So it's a lie.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 42 points 1 day ago (33 children)

i hate musk, but i am not wild about our dependence on china either, so i am not really sure who to root for in this fight...

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Root for better public transport and active cities instead of car dependency :)

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Living in the boonies, I'm never going to get a bus going by every ten minutes so a solid market for good EVs is still what I root for.

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, public transport has a limit and we can root for both as well, including protected bike lanes even in the boonies like we successfully see in the Netherlands

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The public transport bus I take to and from work is a Chinese made electric. It's a Yutong E15.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 95 points 23 hours ago (19 children)

I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 38 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, the Chinese manufacturers are out to make money, and at least we know what to expect from them.

Besides, being profitable usually means making a better product than your competitors.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

GASP!

You mean... Proper capitalism!?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›