this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1664 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

12866 readers
153 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We could have done this 150 years ago when oil gave us 100 times more energy back than it took to extract it.

Humans are a defective species, we must see others suffer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But think of the productivity if we had AI and a 7 day workweek! /s

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

They have AI, we have the "right to work"... for minimum wage 😞

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the plan is that a lot of people get a 0 day work week. That's one of the problems.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I think most people should get a 0 day work week. We could have fully automated luxury gay space communism.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

2 day work week. Standard hours for a work week are just like the minimum wage. They've been stagnant for decades and haven't adjusted according to company profits and worker productivity increases.

2 days. Why would you ask for 4? That puts you in a shitty bargaining position.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Human productivity alone warranted a 4-day workweek. With AI benefits added in, we should be going down to 3.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

No, no, no. They'll just make it so that each of us is expected to do more since AI is "helping" us. Success under capitalism just leads to more work. The number has to keep going up. If they get their arms twisted they may give us a day off, but they will absolutely decrease the pay. My fear is that they would also go, "Oh, well, since you're not working 40 hours a week, even though it's the same work, so no benefits for you 🤷🏿‍♀️."

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's already cooked Bernie. It's a charred dead carcass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago
[–] csh83669@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I just graced with a glorious 0-day work week. There is no chance ANY of this “productivity” will get anywhere near workers. It’s just a new, exciting way to centralize wealth and power. And if the models get as “intelligent” as the claim they will in 5 years, then with a helping of slavery to boot, ones they are “as smart or smarter” than humans, just without pesky things like rights…

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago
[–] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's cool and all but what about maximum salary hours?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, in Germany: There are a lot of unemployed people, and there are a lot of people who want a four-day week, so what we desperately need is working longer hours.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

?

Oh. I missed the sarcasm. But yes, that is how conclusions work in my country, as well.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they just like squeezing out some more. Why should the efficiency gains of the last decades help the people, after all? No, what we really need is richer billionaires.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›