this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
16 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
16
Purported Insider Details about OpenAI Ousting of Sam Altman [/u/Anxious_Bandicoot126] (www.reddit.com)
submitted 1 year ago by ijeff@lemdro.id to c/technology@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/3317598 (!chatgpt@lemdro.id)

  • Concerns about Leadership: There were internal concerns at OpenAI about Sam Altman's leadership, focusing on his alleged disregard for ethical considerations and priorities set by the organization.

  • Issues with Company Direction: Employees raised red flags about Sam pushing the company towards fast growth and fame, potentially compromising safety, quality, and ethical standards.

  • Board Intervention: The OpenAI board's decision to remove Sam as CEO was driven by a need to realign the company with its original mission and values, emphasizing ethics and responsible AI development.

  • Optimism for Future Direction: Despite the challenges, there's a sense of optimism about the future of OpenAI under new leadership, with a focus on returning to an engineering-driven mission and prioritizing safety and ethics in AI development.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Translation: disagreement over how to maximize revenue.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or, they finally realised what a ridiculous dullard Sam Altman is. All hype, no substance.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

deleted

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maximize what revenue? This was the non-profit board that oversees the 501c3 part of the somewhat complex organization. They don’t have any equity in the business components of the organization.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

So theoretically the non-profit board had a disagreement with Sam's desire to push for higher profits in the for-profit subsidiary. Hence, the disagreement over how to maximise revenue.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't actually know that when I fired that off but not for profits do care about revenue and expenditure.