this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
140 points (97.9% liked)

Linux

57171 readers
743 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
140
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by npdean@lemmy.today to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

And omg! I have slept on this feature for so long. I assumed it was just dragging windows to corners and they snap on to the left or right back or top. Then, I installed PopOS and saw an explicit button to turn on windows tiling but I was already using the drag function, so I was confused. I turned it on and omg! I have not felt more stupid and happily surprised by a piece of tech in a while. It just works. I don’t have to be worry about arranging windows a special way for multitasking or for following guides. So much time saved.

How to make the most of it? Have you had a similar experience with something?

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Windows Tiling is just having specific zones or regions defined on the screen where windows can be placed or configured to open in, correct?

I should try it out. There is a part of me that wonders if it would be worth it on a 1080p 15in laptop screen.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

I don't know anymore. I used to think the same thing but then Popos does it automatically.

[–] alexcleac@szmer.info 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was going a long way, until I built a perfect AwesomeWM configuration for myself, and have not changed it for a while now. I am willing to switch to Wayland-based solution now, as it seems to be a bit more performant, but I just can't make myself to do it: my config is really cozy and working

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

I love Linux. You can do this and there is still room for change. I hope some day I too make such a custom thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really like using the PopShell extension on Gnome. I'm hoping it doesn't die out when Pop moves to their new Cosmic DE. So far I still prefer Gnome.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

They will probably gradually change things. A sudden change to the DE can be jarring and confusing to most beginners (to whom it is marketed)

[–] mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 0 points 1 week ago

Neigsendoig (my producer) and I have used i3 for a while... and we've probably stayed on that since we first started using WMs.

That said, we've attempted the likes of Xmonad (configured in Haskell), Awesome (configured in Lua), HerbstluftWM, BSPWM, Hypr (not Hyprland), JWM, Ratpoison and even SXWM.

Neigsendoig and I wouldn't recommend any Wayland compositor due to new security risks (despite an attempt to fix X11 security issues), though a lot of people want Wayland to be shoved down our throats. We personally use X11 due to many things that Wayland devs can't/won't fix.

This is also part of the reason why the two of us are excited about XLibre (as much as some will hate the control of IBM, GNOME and FreeDesktop with their Wayland, Systemd and PipeWire push). Sure, its main developer left the project from what we've heard, but otherwise, there are a lot of contributions to it, and it will improve big time.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›