this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
98 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59157 readers
2528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A detailed explanation and demonstration of a paint that cools down to sub-ambient (3C in ideal conditions) temperatures with no energy input.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zron@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Has anyone here ever owned a white building?

They’re very hard to keep clean, especially in urban environments, which soak up most of the power used for cooling and where this product would be most beneficial.

How easy is this stuff to clean? Is it easily damaged by pressure washing? What kind of cleaners are needed for this to function reliably? Are those cleaners safe for the environment?

[–] CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You are absolutely right to be skeptical. There are a great many downsides to this technology. Getting it grimy, pointing it out of the sky, cloud cover, etc. will nullify any cooling effect. And yes, the DIY preparation shown would be completely destroyed by a powerwasher, or even a moderate storm. That said, I read recently of a university of maryland research team made an improved coating, allowing the nanospheres to withstand significantly increased weathering while still remaining effective.

[–] jawsua@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I understand it right, it's not a laser shooting heat into space. It doesn't require a clear sky to function. It's just moving the heat effectively away from itself by bypassing the atmospheric insulation, wherever that might be. And that goes for pointing it as well, except you wouldn't really want it under direct sun for best heat transfer

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Radiant heat transfer in the real world often appears quite odd in its behaviour despite being seemingly simple. I learned quite a bit about it when I decided to implement radiant ceilings in my home.

Yes, the panel radiates the same amount regardless of where it's pointing. However, other rays are incident on it from other surfaces that deliver heat back to the surface. Thus the point of a selective emitter that emits more than it absorbs. Likewise solar thermal panels are optimally made from selective absorbers, but IRL flat black paints are so much cheaper that it's not worth it.

So thermal comfort often is a result of radiant balance. Your 20° clothing radiates to the walls - the 20° walls radiate to you - there is no net loss of heat, and you are warm.

Step out under the dry, cloudless prairie sky at night, you radiate into the infinite blackness of space. Nothing radiates back. You cool off rapidly. It's not so much that the heat needs to be dumped into space, but that space offers no heat in return.

Seriously it's pretty neat to point my thermal scanner at the night sky and see it read -INF. The night sky is an effectively unlimited radiant sink.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My white building is currently covered by spiders and crud. Luckily it'll soon be cleaned spotless by the first blizzard of the season, which would also polish off this paint.

However this is really just some science YouTubers replicating an experiment, far from a commercial product. It's just for interest. I like Tech Ingredients, they try to do fairly rigorous work on the border of pure and applied science.

[–] akrot@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It's like thst new type of batteries that is revolutionary, but never turns into a product

[–] ExFed@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

You're right: it's probably not practical to paint a building with the stuff. Nighthawkinlight briefly comments on this. I believe the idea is to use it on passive radiator panels to sink heat from a pumped coolant fluid. That way you can strategically place panels (e.g. on the roof) and control them, just like solar heating panels.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/KDRnEm-B3AI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Tech ingredients is a great channel

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's this? Did you rehost it so we dont give google the traffic?

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Piped is a FOSS frontend for YouTube that removes all the tracking/ads/geo restrictions and integrates SponsorBlock. It also doesn't use any official APIs.

Read more about it here

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Its like watching paint cool, I've ALWAYS said that, I did.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=dNs_kNilSjk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.