this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
86 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

4202 readers
725 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Nothing better than destroying the planet for a quick buck off a cheap grift.

Chinese capitalism <---> Planetary destruction <---> USA capitalism

[–] bloodfoot@programming.dev 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right, humans are actually gonna boil the ocean... aren't we.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Rain World (2017)

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

America is putting data centers in the deserts of Arizona because it’s fucking stupid.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 16 points 2 days ago

If we can't stop the energy from being used anyway, why not make a desalination plant out of it too? 🤦

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn’t Microsoft do this a decade or two ago already? Or was that just exploring the idea?

[–] schema@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was to study its effectiveness and sustainability iirc, not meant to be done for actual production at that point in time.

I guess one major downside is that if a component breaks, be it something simple like a capacitor, there is no easy way to replace it, so it has to be designed with that in mind.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are already llava/magma vents in the ocean... But the thought of human heat being added makes me upset because it's just another piece.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I get it, truly, but we've been dejecting heat to the ocean for a good while. Ocean water cools marine engines and equipment, and heck we use rivers to cool lots of things -- even reactors, which ends up back in the ocean. Data center cooling might be one of the more responsible uses because it's (hopefully) not leeching petroleum or radioactive byproducts into the water.

I'm actually a little more upset now than when I started this comment.

>:(

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes and there is already a sun shining above ground so global warming is no problem either.. smh.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is just until they can start putting them in space, behind the moon.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a great idea. OTOH, impossible to calculate the damage to local ecosystems vs. traditional methods.

Totally uneducated guess: Probably better? Cooling is a major power suck, as well as consuming water.

Roughly 40 percent of the electricity consumed by an ordinary data center is for this purpose.

We're draining aquifers that take thousands of years to build up. Don't read up on that, it's horrifying. So if we have to have data centers, I'm gambling that underwater is the lesser of two evils.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All I hear is “China is heating up the ocean too, ON PURPOSE!”

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft and Google both prototyped it. FWIW, they didn't take it to production once the data was collected.

IIRC, cooling worked fine if placed in the right place with circulation, but maintenance and part replacement was a major issue.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

maintenance and part replacement was a major issue

That was my first thought: who's going to be the underwater IT guy?

Edit: as an interesting coincidence, I just interviewed an engineer today who has rescue diver on his resume with 16 years of diving experience

[–] winkly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Quick! The oceans aren’t heating up fast enough! 🤦‍♂️

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Microsoft did it first

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago