This will immediately get struck down in court even if it passes
According to you?
This will immediately get struck down in court even if it passes
According to you?
Republicans: Full of pedophiles and pedophiles protectors.
Imagine believing this is just republicans. smh.
Pretty sure they're 100% zionist though (with the possible exception of chomsky).
More liberal fascism? No surprise.
Unsurprisingly givesomefucks@lemmy.world is banned from my instance (probably for lib shilling?) so I can't reply directly.
But just because the APA admits that their science is trash, that doesn't mean that we need to respect their science. It doesn't mean we should use their pseudo-science as a basis for health care, etc. That's the point.
Who cares? It's not a useful label. That's the point.
The whole DSM is a pseudo-scientific grift that serves capitalism, hegemony, etc., rather than producing positive results through actual science.
Look at the history of the DSM. It's full of phony bullshit just like it is now.
Yeah but that's not science. That's just pseudo-scientific politics.
People shouldn't receive treatment based on fake science.
TBH I wouldn't trust physicists at all with these slop generators. They literally spent 30 years grifting about "string theory" and the "theory of everything". I can't imagine the new "models" that they'll be pooping out.
are driving scientific discovery
And yet no "discovery" is mentioned.
can apply the knowledge they gain from one class of physical systems to completely different problems...
And yet no example was given.
"To me Walrus feels like an exciting step"
What a feeling!
Their goal is to make tools that scientists can use in their day-to-day research.
Cool goal.
"Our hope is that..."
Well as long as the funding keeps coming.
Drugs will fix anything tho, right? I mean medication, not the illegal kind. We need to lock up illegal drug users. \s
But generally when you stop a substance that has negative psychological side effects,
That hasn't been shown by this study.
As far as this study goes, it could be showing that people use weed as a treatment for the psychological strain of a completely fucked society.
Regular sheep probably don't realize anything is wrong and/or they're drunk.
Does that mean that if you quit using cannabis, the anxiety and depression will tone down or disappear?
It could mean the opposite. That's why this kind of research/clickbait is so misleading.
What legal team? The people with money are supporting this. They'll continue to do what they like as always.
Even if this particular law doesn't pass, they'll continue to waste resources on more and more violent control. That's how we got here.
Linux, Gimp, etc. aren't going to assemble and afford a legal team AFAIK.