technocrit

joined 2 years ago
 

Last week was the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision enshrining the idea that money in politics is not corruption, but constitutionally protected speech. States and cities across the US are battling the rotten legacy of that decision.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

I came here to post this same video. It still blows my mind.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Friendly reminder that Kate has nothing to do with Microsoft at all.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The flatpack version is slow and crashy AF.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Fedz are too busy murdering minorities to research this material and prosecute these privileged pedos.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There are lots of reasons why many "scientists" are lowlifes. Most of these problems are a direct result of capitalism, not "science" per se. Thus these problems apply to many occupations beyond just "science".

  • The indoctrination system overtly favors the extremely privileged. That's why so many pale, privileged bros are "scientists". And when people aren't pale skinned, they're usually from the privileged classes on non-euro/usa countries. When these people become "scientists", they become part of the system of guard labor(1, 2), maintaining their own privilege by filtering out the unprivileged.
  • "Science" under capitalism is almost entirely funded and developed for the violent enforcement of capitalism or the violent extraction of profits from exploiting people, animals, and the planet. The people who rise to the top of this system have no real ideals of principles beyond personal privilege.
  • The point of a "career" in "science" is, like any career, to hoard and maintain privilege(1). In order to justify their privilege, many "scientists" adopt fash ideologies like capitalism, etc. that provide justifications for their large piece of the pie.
  • The STEM grift. Just search like "stem science criticism".
  • Lots of "science" is wrong, fake, phony, etc. Just look at the field of "AI", string theory, etc. And now there's so much "AI" research. And corporate "research". The MIC. There's really not that much "science" that's actually beneficial for humanity. It seems like the majority is actually quite harmful... And even those doing "good science" are generally just lucky, while still supporting and working within the same trash system.

It's kind of amazing how people are so indoctrinated into this system that apparently nobody even understands the question. I would just emphasize that I'm talking mostly about career "scientists" under capitalism (not individuals who take a scientific approach to knowledge). I'm saying this as someone with an advanced degree who has seen many, many people turned into lowlifes by this system. Kids come into college wanting to make video games and they end up with career murdering people on the other side of the planet, etc. They barely have a choice.

 

It’s hard to imagine viewers who end up tuning in to the new hagiographic Melania Trump documentary, Melania, having a reaction other than “time to sharpen our guillotines.”

Since "AI" doesn't exist, anything can be "AI".

For example, a translation program is not "AI".

But people do want features like translation regardless of how they're dishonestly marketed.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Javascript? Y'all aren't using text only browsers??!?! Sellouts. \s

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Translations? Tab grouping? Link previews?

These very simple features (which have nothing to do with imaginary "AI") are probably useful to lots of people.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only LLM here is the chatbot which nobody is being forced to use.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is literally no "AI" whatsoever. These are just basic programs.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You mean like translations of text? People mad about this?

Nah, there is no "AI" grouping your tabs. It's just a grift.

 

With roughly 1.8 million commercial trucks on California roads, chances are high that you’ll encounter one on your next drive. But despite the heightened dangers that come with such colossal vehicles, over a hundred unlicensed schools operate in California with little to no oversight.

As CalMatters’ Adam Echelman and Erica Yee explain, under current state law, private trucking schools that charge students $2,500 or less don’t need state licenses. At least 184 trucking schools in California are not regulated by the state, according to a CalMatters analysis of federal data.

Steve Gold, the founder and CEO of a chain of trucking schools, told CalMatters that his commercial trucking program took 18 months to become state certified. His schools charge students $6,000 and require about 160 hours of training. Meanwhile, students in unlicensed programs are told they can finish in 15 hours — the minimum requirement for behind-the-wheel training under state law.

...

 

Sadly, that’s exactly where bike lanes were installed in 2017 after a years-long community process, only to be removed following complaints from drivers used to zooming along the street.

It’s impossible to know whether this tragedy could have been prevented if the bike lanes were still there. But their removal will almost certainly mean Los Angeles will be liable for her death.

 

CHP Officer Adrian Gonzalez, according to SFGATE, said that arriving units “found carnage out there,” and that cars and trucks were “turned over and up on each other, under each other.”

...

Images of the crash, which prompted a six-hour closure of north and southbound lanes, showed several big rigs involved in the pile-up and other vehicles sustaining severe damage that left some of them looking unrecognizable.

 

Critics of Schumer’s leadership took his comments Sunday as yet more confirmation that his relentless and unquestioning support for Israel—despite the genocide in Gaza, the enormous drop in public support for US support of the Israeli government’s policies—as a sign that he remains far out of step with the general public and party membership, especially younger Democrats.

 

“No matter where [people] come from,” Melania announces during one of her grating voiceovers, “we are bound by the same humanity.” Though she speaks with a thick Slavic drawl, she refers only obliquely to her “country of birth” (Slovenia is referenced, directly, once). A parade of immigrants, including French-born fashion designer Hervé Pierre, appear to reinforce this vaguely cosmopolitan angle. “Opportunities, equality,” says Tham Kannalikham, a designer who moved to the US from Laos aged just two. “It’s really the American dream.” These are the good immigrants serving the Trump administration; a far cry from the ones in cages, the ones tear-gassed on the streets of Minneapolis, the ones festering in a jail cell in El Salvador.

 

Ratner’s film plays like a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government. “White and gold – that’s so you,” purrs one of her lickspittles as she busies herself with the colour-scheme for the ball and the incoming first lady allows that yes indeed, this is true.

 

“That’s a Grammy that every artist wants — almost as much as Trump wants Greenland. Which makes sense because, since Epstein’s gone, he needs a new island to hang out with Bill Clinton. I told you, it’s my last year! What are you going to do about it?”

view more: next ›