this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
85 points (96.7% liked)

Games

21560 readers
206 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

EA Sports, it's in Bahrain

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say "very different." It's just going to be worse.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 10 points 2 days ago

Worse in a very different way!

A female sim may not longer leave her lot without a male sim accompanying her

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

"Different!"

Better?

"No."

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

They were hot garbage before. They exist to make money from gamers. Nothing wrong with that in and of itself, but you basically have two kinds of game developers. Those who love gaming, and those who are tired of or burned out from gamers and just want to exploit gaming. Live long enough, you'll see a lot of companies go from the first camp to the second (Bethesda, Blizzard). Developers and publishers in the second camp are best avoided. Problem is, people keep buying their games. So you've gotta try to support the ones in the first group. And, sometimes people actually like games from trash developers. Some will tell you their games are not that bad or that they found something they love.

EA's been in the second group for a long time. I don't think they will get any better. I think I will go on ignoring their games.

Honestly, EA was so bad before that they couldn't possibly get worse. Either their games get better or everything stays the same as it already was.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

well sure, it'll be worse. Not like EA has had a glorious track record or produced original and innovative/good games in the past god knows how many years. They'll just transition purely to the Madden and Battlefield company with some Sims sprinkled in every now and again. that's it. Mass Effect is pretty much going to be done and dusted. fat chance we'll ever see another Titanfall. And I bet they'll buy the license for WWE from 2k or just offer WWE/TKO more money. With how closely the Saudi's are now with WWE and the fact EA already has the UFC...yeah makes sense.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Aw man, I was really looking forward to the new battlefield too. Oh well :/

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait... Aren't they a "private company" in the first place?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They're publicly traded. Well, they were. Now they aren't.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What happens to stock people owned in EA?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 7 points 2 days ago

They get paid $215 for every share they owned. So if you held 100 shares, you get a fat $21,500 check.

[–] Unpeeled3828@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

With a bit of luck we'll get a new SSX with the guy's favorite DJ and footballer as playable characters.