this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
199 points (92.7% liked)

Fediverse

37407 readers
239 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I always felt like it was wrong to block an account unless it was smth absolutely insane. Nazis etc.

But now I'm blocking people who's tone I dont like, or who are baiting or actingnin bad faith.

I know I can't do it as a mod. But i can certainly do it as an individual now. Judgy comment? Blocked. Unnecessarily confrontational? Blocked.

This is new to me, literally 3 days. Wonder how this affects my feed. Only disappointing thing is they can still see and respond to my posts, just that I can't see it. I wish they couldn't see anything I posted either.

What are your blocking habits? If you do block a lot of people, has that affected your experience?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Haven't felt the need to block anyone but it's nice to have the functionality

[–] Mesa@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't block unless it's excessive spam. Informational disadvantage, yadda yadda.

I just exercise the same muscle I use to restrain myself from responding to bait on modern day Reddit, since my account there is still active but not posting (yes, even lurking is technically contribution, but there's too much useful information there for me to justify completely cutting it out).

And for the record, I disagree with block features removing posts from the user on the other end. Public information -> only I get to decide what I do and don't see. Private information -> only I get to decide what I do and don't share. A bit idealistic, but we're talking about a web forum here.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

People over use blocking like crazy.

I constantly see people blocking others just for making a point they disagree with. Rather than actually think through the logic and reasoning of what the other person is saying they go 'oh I have no counter point to that, that must mean that you're arguing in bad faith, blocked'.

The internet is already an inherent filter bubble, you don't need to accelerate that. Most people would benefit from spending more time deeply considering that they might be wrong in ways they can't fully comprehend, then they would blocking people who fervently disagree with them.

Cool, block me too

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I block freely. My time and attention and mental and emotional bandwidth are limited resources, and to the extent possible I intend to spend them carefully.

I tend to ask questions about their opinion until they stop responding.

I like to pretend they’ve realised the absurdity of their own stance.

In reality I’m just easily amused.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

When I see I have a message/reply in my Lemmy inbox, then open the inbox and see nothing - there is such a relaxing feeling pressing "mark all as read", knowing I just avoided an annoying interaction from some idiot I've blocked in the past.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I wish there was a hide posts option, rather than a flat out block. There are some overly prolific posters that i would like to block, but their comments are not an issue, just the 40 rapid fire posts they make everyday.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

of course not, we all respect our local mothfucker

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I hardly ever block individual posters, but communities, I've blocked 936 of them at the time of making this post. Sports, porn, anime, or furry shit are all block on sight. Plus a handful of randoms that I'm just not interested in.

I've finally got All where it's pleasant to browse. Takes some doing, but worth the effort if you want to customize your feed reductively vs actively seeking out and subscribing to communities.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

I may have to start doing this. I've subscribed to enough that I see enough to keep me occupied, and if I don't I go to All and add anything that I find particularly interesting. This mean I miss new things I might really enjoy unless I'm not as occupied with my current subscription list. This could be better.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about language issues? I dont browse all bc half the time I dont get the languages. Changing the language is apparently buggy on Lemmy.

Also blocking instances doesn't cut it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wjs018@piefed.social 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More people need to make use of the curation tools available to them in my opinion. Too often I see people browsing /all and then complain about seeing tons of stuff that they don't like. There are tools that are available to them to help them create a more pleasant experience that they just aren't using. The fediverse doesn't have some algorithm that learns the type of content that you most often engage with and feed it to you, you have to more proactively do the curation yourself.

Just as an example, I was in a conversation with one of the lemmy.world admins a while back. We were talking about instance blocks and how infrequently users actually use them. Across all of the users on lemmy.world, only about 700 of them actually created an instance block for the most-blocked instance (lemmynsfw). Only two instances had more than 500 users block it.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Curation tools is brilliant. Thats what it should be seen as.

Very well put. Also the important point of the lack of learning algorithm.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's great for your mental state.

Just be aware of any filter bubble you might create. If you block every person that has an opposite perspective, you'll fall into your own echo chamber.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 6 days ago

This is the biggest reason why I only block sparingly. If you aren't regularly challenged in a way that forces you to assess and explain your world view and why it makes sense to you, then you risk becoming detached from reality in the same way that so many people have these days. It's easy to fall into the idea that your way of thinking is inherently correct, especially when you only interact with people who agree with you.

It's tough to interact with someone who disagrees with you, especially on the internet where people can be unnecessarily harsh, but it's also good to do for your own understanding of the world. I think of it like a workout for my moral compass - if I can't fully explain why my viewpoint is more accurate than someone else's, then there's something I'm missing, and I know where I need to spend more time reassessing my beliefs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Blocking is great. I truly wish more people would block. We would be able to all have a more enjoyable experience.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] N0Decaf4M3@lemmy.coffee 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Only disappointing thing is they can still see and respond to my posts, just that I can't see it. I wish they couldn't see anything I posted either.

I understand. Lemmy users are divided on that issue because not only can these people see, comment and downvote your post, they can manipulate the situation to their advantage (feel free to use your imagination or search posts about blocking).

FWIW, I hear you loud and clear. Please understand that there are plenty of people in this world who are angry, unfulfilled and can’t/won’t touch grass whose only gratification is to try to make other people miserable. This mental instability coupled with current events is unfortunately unleashed here in Lemmy and you.

Block away and save your sanity. I’m here for the jokes and your memes. If I want to argue, I’ll go to work and get paid. Sadly, you are a volunteer and many people don’t realize that — they seem to think that it’s your job to take their crap. For that, I am truly sorry.

Two of my friends recently blocked .world and had good experiences with users from other instances. Recently, there was negativity in Uplifting News that had to be addressed; a .world mod left because they were burned out; some more drama recurring also at .world instance.

Please take good care of yourself and don’t take &#!+ from any of us!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People who I notice just dont get jokes and are in 20 different meme communities being all serious? Blocked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Been doing this with a warning system. I tag shitty people and block them if I see a person who is tagged acting shitty.

2 years in, no regrets.

I do wish Lemmy would fix the blocking system though. If someone who I've blocked responds to me, I don't see it. Fair enough, but I also don't see what people who respond to that say. I feel like it should just show the username as [blocked] and the content as [hidden] with an option for me to show that content/username, while keeping the rest of the child content fully visible.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How should Lemmy handle it if they quote a portion or even the entire message in a child comment? If someone's goal is to not have to worry about shit someone says, and then they are still shown what that person says, does that not defeat the purpose of blocking?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Show it.

Take for example the case where person A has blocked person B.

Person C comments. Person B responds.

New thread, same post, person C comments about how some people think like person B, and quote them.

As is the current case, person A can see this quoted material. It's just text. It's not in any programmatic way tied to the person B account.

We don't need to change this just because it's a child comment of person B.

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are your blocking habits?

I made it through nearly two years and eventually caved after I made the mistake of arguing in favor of the truth, supported by video evidence and a fact check from an internationally recognized fact-checking organization only to be told to "fuck off", a second user said that they enjoyed pissing on my shoe(s) in their personal fight against truth, and some other catastrophically braindead takes. I generally don't like the blocking approach for opinions I don't agree with because everyone has differing views and also people have bad days and that's just life. However, being actively hostile to the truth and being extremely confrontational about it was a bridge too far for me and it was either blocking a few mouldy potatoes in an attempt to keep things tolerable or getting off the threadi/fediverse so I decided to give the former a whirl.

If you do block a lot of people, has that affected your experience?

Thankfully haven't felt the need to block many, so the only thing I've really noticed is that occasionally one of the blocked users comments in the thread for something I've submitted (which I don't get a notification for and can't see) - but then someone unrelated replies to them and then I get a notification for a comment chain which I can't actually load. It took me a while to even figure out why I was getting these "ghost" notifications.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Only disappointing thing is they can still see and respond to my posts, just that I can't see it. I wish they couldn't see anything I posted either.

I've seen this view in discussions of blocking before and it really bugs me. You're desiring to unilaterally control what I can see and do on the Fediverse.

This is how it works on Reddit and it's a terrible mechanism. It means you can preemptively ensure that anyone who might refute misinformation will be excluded from your threads before you post them. It means you can step into a conversation I'm having with someone, derail it, and then prevent me from responding to your derail. Over on Reddit by far the most common use I see of the block tool is to get the "last word" in on whatever argument is going on, posting some sort of seemingly clever comeback and then instantly blocking me before I can point out the flaws.

For anyone wondering how the blocking feature has been weaponized to spread misinformation, in 2022 a redditor did an experiment: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheoryOfReddit/comments/sdcsx3/testing_reddits_new_block_feature_and_its_effects/

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

I don't understand this view either. What's it to ya? You cant see what the person does anyway. There doesn't seem to be a point behind it besides control.

Also, it simply is difficult to implement. You have to tell every server "do not show my posts and comments to these accounts". Other servers can just choose to ignore that. It's centralized thinking to believe the "feature" will work all the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

I have similar blocking habits. People who will not be enriching my life tend to announce themselves with brain-dead comments, hostility, or starting arguments just for the sake of arguing. I don't hesitate to block people like that.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 9 points 1 week ago

I just tag the worst assholes and then simply not engage next time.

[–] emmanuel_car@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

I have been working in IT for too long. First thought upon reading the title was you were obstructing someone’s work.

[–] docus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

I have blocked hundreds of communities to sanitise my ‘all’ feed, and a few foreign language instances. But only a handful of obnoxious users. The users I’m inclined to block often end up banned anyway

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm more on mastodon and their filter system is so nice

I made a filter for "idiot did a thing" and every time the news has another article about how some idiot whose name is on my list did something again, as they do, because that's all they've been doing for 20 years, I no longer have to read it.

But I still get the little "something was blocked, click here to read it" thing, so it's very satisfying.

I don't block often, but I would expect it's a similar upgrade.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›