this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
95 points (84.2% liked)

Technology

72414 readers
2873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A more interesting “bear case” for AI is that, if you look at the list of industries that leading AIs like GPT-4 are capable of disrupting—and therefore making money off of—the list is lackluster from a return-on-investment perspective, because the industries themselves are not very lucrative. What are AIs of the GPT-4 generation best at? It’s things like:

writing essays or short fictions

digital art

chatting

programming assistance

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What about LLMs that are taking over or helping with jobs that require sorting and organizing complicated data, and they do it fast, 24/7, and with just enough accuracy. They’re not flawless, but they mess up less than poorly trained and high turnover staff.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 2 years ago

LLMs don't sort or organize data. Machine learning can do it but LLMs specifically only generate text. I think that's the whole point. People confuse machine learning with LLMs. Machine learning can do amazing things in many industries. Companies creating dedicated products using machine learning can make money. LLMs themselves can do very little and huge valuations of companies like OpenAI don't make much sense.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

This is exciting it just probably hasnt come to fruition this quarter. And businesses that are succeeding with AI dont really need to brag about it in the news. (Amazon?)

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

AI will utterly upend the entertainment industry. Once AI can generate movie-length animated output, Hollywood will go the way of the vaudeville. Directors, film crew, actors and all the supply chain and ancillary industries revolving around movie-making will be obsolete.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

II thin it's actually possible. Normally the argument against is that "AI can't be creative" but when was the last time Hollywood made a creative movie? "Write a script for Spiderman movie. Include origin story. Spiderman will fight Green Goblin. Again.".

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

when was the last time Hollywood made a creative movie?

Most Pixar films. They're entirely animated in cg, and yet I highly doubt the ability of an ai to generate a better final product.

[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They can't what do you think the writers strike was all about??

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 2 years ago

The thing is, the protections writers won only protected them when working WITH AI. I.e. companies can't hire unionized writers and pay them less because they are using AI. If they can skip the writers all together all those protections go out the window.

I'm not saying this will happen soon or at all. I'm just saying that if the models become capable or generating screen ready material the protections writers won won't matter anymore.

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Weird that AI isnt replacing things like management, CEOs, stock investors, accountants... you know, jobs that tend to be about numbers and efficiency, which you would think AI would excel at.

Instead, we have it skirting copyright by stealing other people works and changing it just enough to not be a direct copy.

[–] kpw@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

stock investors, accountants

Computers already replaced a lot of them long ago.

management, CEOs

What part of their jobs do you think an AI can replace?

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What part of their jobs do you think an AI can replace?

The whole sitting around, profiting from actual laborers part, I'm guessing.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

YouTube sacks people by algorithm for some time now.

[–] Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The fucking antiwork crowd is insufferable and intellectually dishonest. Be better. This is such a sad comment.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Why? Why can an AI not replace a CEO? And why has CEO compensation risen, while average worker compensation dropped, all while worker output has increased over the past decades? That seems like simple math, that the money isn't going to who it should be going to and is just going to management and investors because they make the rules