A an 8GB RX 7600 is around $300. Add everything else and $700 sounds about right. May not sell high volumes but there's got to be dozens of manufacturers making minipcs. It's still a full on computer. It's be a good value workstation. My gaming PC is my photo and video editor
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
80 points (75.3% liked)
Steam Hardware
21230 readers
308 users here now
A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to Steam Hardware or Steam OS in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah… $700 sounds totally reasonable to me. Do I wish it were cheaper? Sure! I would love for it to be accessible to more people.
But $700 seems very reasonable for the hardware being offered.
If it's 700 I'll wait for a few months of reviews, 500 I'll preorder it. I do want to replace my Xbox.
Michael Pachter is, was, and always will be a complete idiot. Back in the PS2 era he stated that it was no big deal if Sony sold out in North America, they could just move units over from Europe... ignoring the fact that both the video and electricity standards don't match.
$700 isn't a "death sentence", know how we know this?
ROG Xbox Ally X - $1000
PS5 Pro - $750
Xbox Series X - $650
ROG Xbox Ally - $600
PS5 - $550
Steam Deck - $550
Xbox Series S - $450
If Valve REALLY wanted to break people's brains, they would release a "Supply your own RAM and storage" version for $399.
€399 I'm sold for a kit without ram or ssd
The steam NUC
I'm game for the barebones version. As a matter of fact, that's what I'm hoping they do, otherwise, I don't think I'll get a Steam Machine.
Michael Pachter being comically wrong and out of touch was a running joke at Ars Technica and gamesindustry.biz back in the day. He's the Jim Cramer of industry analysts.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I really don't understand the hand-wringing about the cost. I see comments all the time about how it's "DOA" at some price or another and it strikes me as someone projecting their own preferences and values, including the "analyst" quoted in the article.
As an outside observer you don't know a) Valve's goals; b) almost anyone else's preferences and values.
I say this as someone who enjoys gaming, won't ever buy a console and won't ever build a gaming rig. This product is perfect for me and I'd have to feel like Valve were purposely screwing me to not buy it. I may be a minority but I can't be alone.
Yeah, you're absolutely right. I'm in a slightly different demographic, but am still really interested in the steam machine. I'd be happy building my own gaming rig, but:
- Pricing out all that stuff, ordering it, building it is a lot of work, I'd want to see some benefit for that work,
- After pricing it all out, maybe I look at a steam machine and decide it's a better deal.
Realistically, steam machines, consoles, and custom gaming rigs are all approximately the same hardware and the same market. If the price of the steam machine is going up, so is its competition.
Yeah I think that was my point about feeling like Valve is purposely screwing me. Microsoft showed with the Xbox Ally X that their appetite for hardware subsidies is waning (perhaps even their appetite for hardware at all).
Valve has a lot of goodwill with Steam Deck owners and I think if they price it at a number higher than any one person's expectations, that person is less likely to think it's Valve's fault, than if Sony were to do the same.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I have been, since day fucking one, befuddled by how people think this thing is going to be anything less than $700, it just does not add up to me.
People are looking at the price of the steam decks and non-pro versions of consoles.
Well, they should be looking at low to mid range modern gaming laptops and minimum the pro versions of consoles
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's not a console, stop expecting console prices. A $1000 price point wouldn't even surprise me.
That's actually what i figured it would be. I'm 42 and this will be my first ever premade since i was old enough to build my own.
We expected it to be more than that, actually. If it's $700, that's pretty good. It's not a Switch. It's a prebuilt gaming PC in a tiny form factor. Building a gaming PC today with the same horsepower would probably set you back a lot more than that, and you'll also have a giant tower taking up space.
It's not for me, but I can think of at least 3 people in my family who would get a lot of value out of it at that price point. No PC-building headaches, no researching every bit of hardware and comparing prices and performance, no tedious planning of the cooling layout, no thermal paste, no separate warranties and RMA headaches for every individual component, no Windows bullshit, not needing an entire corner of the room just for the tower, perfect for the living room, driver and software updates that apply to and work for every customer, I could go on. I don't see any downside for the average gamer. Sure, if you're an FPS penny pincher who simply has to OC and have the best of the best and latest hardware, it'll not appeal to you. But that's a minority of gamers.
$700 is a dream. $1,000 is reasonable in the current climate I guess, but pushing it a little. $1,500 would be unfortunate, but it really depends on what extra value the system comes with from Valve. I wanna know their RMA and warranty plans. If they're anything north of "Kafkaesque", which is how it is with virtually every other hardware manufacturer/reseller, the extra money might actually be worth it, for one's mental health. If they send out a replacement unit before you have to return a defective one, for example, that would be enough to justify a little more cost, but that's coming from someone with a long and storied history of nightmarish, abusive RMA practices. I'd suck a dog's dirty dick to not have to go through that shit again.
Yeah.
My instant reaction was "$700? It'd be a miracle if Valve hits that. What's Ars thinking?"
Yeah at 700 I'd probably buy one once my wife and I have permanent employment. It would make it a great htpc/game console
“I think Valve was hoping for a much lower price and that the component issue would be short-term,” Cole said. “Obviously it is looking more like a long-term issue.”
I think we all knew this would be a long term issue.
The shortages will be addressed. But prices ain’t coming down.
Probably 2 or 3 years before shortages are addressed.
It's basically a gaming laptop.
Taking out the screen, the windows license, and some of the margin since Valve will make it back with game sales, $1,000 was the minimum expectable price before RAM got pulled into the “AI” bubble.
If they can make the steam deck for $350, why would the steam machine cost 3x more? Similarly if Sony and Xbox are selling their consoles for $500-600 it would indicate that something a bit more would be feasible. Sony and Xbox get some economies of scale, but most evidence points to them selling at cost or making some profit (from what I recall).
The steam deck is nice, but you have to throttle a lot of games performance. And that's on an already very small screen. I have played the crap out of my steam deck, but there are some games that just don't work super well. The difference is just the power of the components, primarily CPU and GPU, but also RAM and SSD speeds. It would expect the mini gaming PC to be more expensive than the handheld, if the expectation is that you can play any large AAA game at (basically) full specs with good frame rate. You can't do that for cheap. I also don't expect the price point to be a problem
load more comments
(1 replies)
With all the revenue from Steam, how much of a loss could they afford to go all in on with these? Do they care about profit or shifting the market from Windows to Linux (or, hell, just giving the finger to Microslop)?
The problem is that these are computers. If they're too cheap, companies will buy them in bulk, slap windows on them, and use them for office PCs. And if they're sold at a loss, that then turns into a huge loss
load more comments
(1 replies)
Valve has said repeatedly they won't subsidize it heavily because it's more of a generic desktop than the deck was. A low subsidized price could attract buyers that wouldn't spend money on games (ie. using for office machines)
Exactly. And we saw people doing that with the Steam Deck. Disney was using it to control their robots. Ukraine was using them to control IRL turrets. That's just what we know of.
They would instantly catch an anti-trust case from Epic for trying to use their dominant software position to undercut hardware manufacturers and take control of both gaming hardware and software.
Do they think valve's lawyers are not as good as Nintendo's or something?
They were supposedly able to take a loss on the original Steam Decks, at least the lower priced 64GB models. There's also an argument to be made that this device is primarily competing with consoles, where Steam doesn't have a monopoly. Steam also allows games from other stores to be run on their unlocked device, it's not their fault that Epic decided not to make an offical linux launcher.
But I'm not a lawyer, and I'm sure Epic will try to start anti-trust investigations over anything they can.
They were supposedly able to take a loss on the original Steam Decks, at least the lower priced 64GB models.
They. Did. Not.
The only thing remotely suggesting that is GabeN saying the price point was "painful" in a single interview.
Valve has stated that the Steam Decl wasn't sold at a loss. GabeN was likely referring to the profit margins being very low, which is not the same as selling at a loss
Why the hell can't this myth just die already?
Sweeny would sue Steam because Gabe farted and Tim didn't get to smell it.
The problem with a price war is Valve is "just" a multi-billion dollar company, very impressive for their size but a $100bn company like Sony and especially a $3 trillion company like Microsoft could squeeze them out of the market.
And they would have to subsidise the cost by far more than Sony/Microsoft do due to the smaller scale of production and more expensive newer contracts.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Here's a way to think of it:
It's a mini-pc.
But a bit bigger.
So... yeah, even if it is expensive by console pricing standards... $600 to $1000 is actually a pretty reasonable range for comparably powerful mini-pcs.
Look up like NUCBoxes or Minisforum miniPCs.
The runor that MooresLawIsDead was initially running with was that the actual custom chip they are using was originally slated to be used in something like a new variant of a MicroSlop Surface tablet.
AMD fabbed a bunch, MicroSlop bailed on the idea, leaving AMD with a bunch of weird custom chips they don't know wtf to do with.
Valve then goes to AMD, begins to uh, think with portals, or whatever.
Also to get access to using it as a PC fully, PC Games, Way More Apps, and mod support is more than worth it
Its basically Steam Deck in a different way
Yes, that's all true.
It is not just a console, it is a full-on PC.
Run your own home media mode, browse the web, make stuff in Blender, write and compile code, etc, I do all of that regularly with my docked Steam Deck.
But I went with Mini PC rather than Steam Deck for comparison because, though it very much literally is a Steam Deck 3.0, in a lot of ways... I think its closer to a mini PC than anything else.
MiniPCs are basically small boxes often comparable to, I dunno, a large jar of pickles, in size. They... also do not have the functionality of a gamepad controller, or built in screen, as actual physical parts of them.
And they basically always have integrated cpu+mobo, RAM is usually laptop SODIMM form factor, and then either the cpu they use is actually an apu, or an npu, as opposed to laptops often having a discrete but laptop sized gpu, or full-on pcs typically having full-on gpus.
Or, its becoming more common for a mini-pc to juat be designed with either an oculink port, or a usb 4.0/tbunderbolt port, with the idea being that its a decent general purpose work pc in its own, and if you want to game on it (or do some other kind of more intensive work like video editing/rendering, complex 3d model creation, etc), you get an eGPU cradle, stick a power supply and desktop GPU in it, and then connect it to the miniPC, which can then use that GPU nearly as efficiently as if it were just directly plugged into it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
As long as it's comparable price or cheaper than a pre-built of similar specs or building a similar build yourself, they'll be a market for it. There's always people looking to get into PC gaming and existing PC gamers who want their Steam library in a console form factor.
They can set the asking price to whatever they want but I have zero interest in the "why" in terms of a high price, which for me is anything over about £450. Anything more than that and it simply isn't appealing to me. I don't care whether that's reasonable or not in terms of their costs. My wallet cannot in any form justify anything more on what is primarily a toy. It's one of the reasons I don't have a current gen console but have had at least one from each generation going back to the mid 1990s.
If you ask more than I'm willing to spend, no sale. Sorry, guys.
Valve also said they are not willing to sell hardware at a loss so there is that
As I said, how they arrive at the price isn't something I care about. They could be making a loss or a killing and it'd be all the same to me.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Will the steam box have slots for ram or SSD so the user can upgrade the hardware later?
The m.2 SSD is easily accessible, it comes with a 2230 m.2 (same size as the Steam Deck), but has room to install a full size 2280 m.2. It only has room for 1 though, so while you can upgrade to a larger size you can't add a second. Swapping out the m.2 will require cloning your drive or reinstalling SteamOS to the new drive.
There's also a high speed microSD slot for even easier space upgrades, and microSDs with games can be swapped directly between the Deck and Machine.
For RAM, it uses laptop DDR5. It is user upgradable, but isn't as easy to access as the m.2 drive is.
Back in November, the SM announcement inspired me to get an off-brand mini gaming PC with a 8745HS and 16GB DDR5 / 512GB SSD for a little less than $400. That machine today is now $500. Its 780M is about double the graphical power of the Deck, so assuming pricing is proportional to the GPU, the SM would’ve been like $499 in November and $599 at today’s prices.
Small sample size and perhaps invalid assumptions, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s correct. Then again, the RTX 5080 I was also looking at the time for $1000 is now $1500.
I hope I can hold off because I wasn’t planning on buying new pc hardware until 2027. But what if the steam machine is sold out and the powerful components are unattainable by that point?
Gotta get my money’s worth from the old stuff.
I'm still buying it
Right now i have my steam deck in a dock hooked up to the tv along with a couple cheap bluetooth controllers. A tiny silent PC capable of true 1080p instead of upscaled 720p would be attractive. Sure I could build a SFFPC that could easily outperform the steam machine (but why? as my TV can only do 1080p/60fps), but I doubt I could build something as nice for a similar price.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›