this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1724 points (96.4% liked)

Fediverse

20375 readers
365 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy@endlesstalk.org 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

As an alternative to lemmy.world I would like to suggest my own instance endlesstalk.org.

I have no plans to deferate or ban anything releated to piracy. Only thing that might change my mind would probably be a company taking legal action against me.

I also strive to have as little downtime as possible and keep everything running smoothly.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GenBlob@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Sucks for us interested in it but It's completely understandable. Making an account on another instance and transferring your data takes no time at all, which is exactly what I did.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Trekman10@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some are doing one step more and registering on the instances hosting the piracy communities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] npxtune@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yep, just signed up on a different instance 🙂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FujiTive@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Not sure why nobody in the comments is distinguishing between blocking a community on an instance (removing /c/piracy) and defederating instances (saying your users can't subscribe to otherinstance.com/c/piracy). They are very different things. We should be very skeptical of defederation.

Removing a community because it violates the rules of your instance is A-OK and every instance should do this. Anybody can run an instance, and anybody can set their own rules, that's the whole idea of federation.

De-federating other instances because you find their content objectionable is less ok. Lemmy is like e-mail. Everybody registers at gmail or office365 or myfavoriteemail.com. Every email host runs their own servers, but they all talk to each other through an open protocol. You would be pissed to find out that gmail just suddenly decided to stop accepting mail from someothermailprovider.com because a bunch of their users are pirates or tankies. Or blocked your favourite email newsletter from reaching your inbox because it had inflammatory political content.

Allowing your users to receive e-mail, or content from subcommunities on other lemmy instances is not a legal risk like hosting the content yourself is (IANAL etc). Same way Gmail is not liable if somebody on some other e-mail server does something illegal by emailing a gmail user. That's why you can register at torrentwebsite.com and get a user confirmation email successfully delivered to your inbox. Gmail is federated with all other e-mail services without needing to endorse them or accept legal liability for them.

Lemmy's strength, value, and future comes from being the largest federated space for link-sharing and other forms of communication.

De-federation is bad.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›