this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
258 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29461 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Mamdani Act would amend existing immigration law to prohibit the admission and naturalization of any noncitizen who is or was a member of, affiliated with, or advocates for a Chinese communist, communist, socialist, Islamic fundamentalist or other totalitarian party—or any organization that advocates those ideologies. Under its deportation provisions, a noncitizen already in the United States could be removed if they engage in advocacy for socialism, communism, Marxism or Islamic fundamentalism, distribute or publish material promoting those ideologies or hold membership in affiliated organizations at any point after admission.

You know he is a much needed anti-toxin, especially when they name a bill after him. Let the healing begin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 33 minutes ago

The GOP is full of idiots

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 hours ago

Mamdani is a centrist, he isn't left. But since the Republicans are alt right and the Democrats are right, they consider everything else to be far left and label anything that isn't right as communist. They don't know what communism is. Even Trump labeled people communist nazis. Communists and nazis are the opposite of eachother. Americans are so, so fucking dumb.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 26 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

First amendment lawyers are gonna have a FIELD DAY with this one 😭

[–] anthropozaen@feddit.org 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Watch the Trump admin revoke their licences.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Barr licenses are provided by states individually.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Silly you, thinking laws and rules mean anything

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

I mean where have you been? If laws and rules no longer had any meaning then why is the administration being forced to give back the tariff money and repeal them? Why was the admistration forced to re-hire thousands of federal employees it illegally terminated? Why was the national gaurd forced to leave several cities?

These were all decided by the courts and the administration complied. I'm not saying compliance is perfect, and I'm not saying the administration isn't trying to do very undemocratic things. But clearly there is still some rule of law.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

The prevailing sentiment from the Lemmy community is that Trump is completely unstoppable and we should all just give up and accept his tyranny.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They would kill Jesus himself

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago

It isn't a real Jesus unless it comes from the crucifixion region in Jerusalem, otherwise its just sparkling hispanic

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

That means this bill has to define socialism. Good luck with that one bucko, if you have 10 socialists in a room, you get 11 definitions /s

I'm genuinely curious how it gets defined. I'm wondering if it can be sidestepped with a simple word change

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

That means this bill has to define socialism.

It's not meant to have a definition. That's why the proposed law denies judicial review. The "definition" is supposed to be whatever the ICE ~~Officer~~ Gestapo wants it to be.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 hours ago

That's not an issue with the law, it's a feature. They don't need to prove you fit a definition. They only need to prove that they can call you a socialist. Anyone to the left of whatever positions they don't like are in danger of this law. It doesn't matter if you'd call yourself a socialist, only if they would.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 51 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's reds under the bed. If anyone in a position of power says you're a socialist then you're a socialist and you get made stateless and dumped in Nigeria.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 hours ago

Yea this is absolutely red scare bs, but I'm morbidly curious about this thought crime

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 hours ago

I'm genuinely curious how it gets defined

?? whom ever is head of Immigration says it is.. it will be deliberately nebulous so you can say "banned because they are a socialist " if you have dark skin and don't wear Kirkland pants to the interview.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 13 points 8 hours ago

The law states tge process has no legal review, so its whatever definition ICE wants to use, since no judge can say its wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We need 100 years of McCarthyism towards right wingers and fascist ideologies

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Yea a COINTELPRO reverse uno but it would also literally make our country a better place

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 hours ago

I know literacy is not their strong suit, but current immigration law already prohibits being a member of a communist or totalitarian party. There are exceptions, of course.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Chip Roy wouldn’t have a job without gerrymandering.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 72 points 9 hours ago

We MUST deport ANYONE who DOESNT like having Sex With Children!

-Republicans!

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 30 points 8 hours ago

Freedom of speech, unless it's speech we don't like

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Remember MCarthyism? It's back - in redneck form!

[–] eyelevel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I wanna see it on a pog!

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 66 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So he’d have deported Einstein, then?

[–] Pimp_C@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 hours ago

Without a doubt these pieces of shit would've deported him, ur watching the same bad movie with an orange rapist as the lead actor, arent u, lol?

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 40 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

It's never been that in its totality. It has alwas had an unspoken "for some" implied after "land of the free".

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 hours ago
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

We're back in the red scare and McCarthyism lol

Chip Roy can go Hitler himself

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't socialism and communism the opposite of totalitarianism- more or less? So basically "we're going to reject anyone who can't think like a Capitalist and give them all your money, cuz they definitely deserve it"...

throws down newspaper "That's it! I'm running for president!" I'm going to campaign on the mentality of FOSS and advocate for privacy, not big brother and capitalism. I just can't listen to this ludicrous bs anymore.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

Isn’t socialism and communism the opposite of totalitarianism- more or less?

Yeah, if it went as Marx predicted, and socialism emerged from the contradictions in mature capitalist societies. That has partially happened in a few places on the Nordic tier. But human nature being what it is, some self-described communist parties have instead been totalitarian state-capitalist entitties with strong nationalist features. That applies to the two empires that attempted to leap-frog from feudalism to socialism without an intervening capitalist stage: Russia and China. Both instead recreated the industrial revolution at gunpoint, with no worker control of the means of production. Post-Gorbachev, Russia has abandoned the pretense of socialism entirely and is now a kleptocractic plutocracy. China has doubled down on a form of mercantilist state capitalism. Both retain imperialist tendencies and oppress minority ethnicities within their borders.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 21 points 9 hours ago

Yay! Free violations of the first amendment!

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck this regressive shithole of a country! Goddam!

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I hate living here.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hell yeah, we’re bringing thought crime back!

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 8 hours ago

Third Red Scare, baby! What's old is new again!

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So if I’m an American citizen who also is a socialist, where do I get sent?

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You're not going to believe this but straight to Alligator Alcatraz

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Son of a bitch

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Only fascists allowed? Sounds like the constitution only matters when it benefits conservatives.

load more comments
view more: next ›