AbouBenAdhem

joined 1 year ago
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Front left: phone, small bills, crow-calling whistle
Front right: keys, multitool, tin of peanuts
Back right: wallet
Back left: spare change, spare mask, small magnet

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Any chance the Starlink satellites could be built to double as a sort of large-array telescope themselves, to compensate for the ground-based interference?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

And maybe don’t beat your kids even if you’re not at risk of losing your job over it.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I remember in the late 90s the Green Party in my district was on a roll, culminating in the election of a member to the California State Assembly (one of the highest posts ever held by the Greens in the US). Then came Nader’s presidential bid and its perceived role in the election of Bush, which permanently crippled the legitimacy of the local party. They’re still doing great work with voter guides, legislative analysis, etc.; but they’ll never escape the shadow of Nader and Stein.

I think the only viable path for a third party now is to start a new one from scratch, and disavow presidential bids from the outset.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

The problem here is that if this is unreliable...

And the problem if it is reliable is that everyone becomes dependent on Google to literally define reality.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Those would be easy things to add, if you were trying to pass it off as real.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

A closer US parallel might be getting appointed to the Supreme Court.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 130 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Regardless of how the image was generated, why is Google treating a random blogspam site as the authoritative version of a work of art over (say) Wikipedia?

According to the article:

As 404 Media has reported in January, Google is regularly surfacing AI-generated websites that game search engine optimization before the human-made websites they are trained on. “Our focus when ranking content is on the quality of the content, rather than how it was produced,” Google told 404 Media in a statement at the time.

Does that mean I can search for any famous image, take the largest existing version, upscale it by 1% and post it on my own site, and instantly be featured at the top of google searches?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In part it might be trying to head off trouble during and after the election with Republican state officials interfering with the election process—they might be more hesitant if they see other Republican leaders supporting Harris.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For the Greek gods, the greatest sin was attempting to be like them.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If there’s ever a Giraffe Interchange Format, I’ll pronounce it the same as giraffe. And unlike some people, I’ll be able to tell the two apart.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Stuck a wire in a power outlet.

 

To clarify: I’m not suggesting animals think all sounds are songs—just that songbirds and humans are the only common animals that combine sounds into arbitrary sequences where each individual sound doesn’t have a single fixed meaning.

view more: next ›