this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
40 points (90.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
354 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note that this news outlet has a history of sending lawyers to harass people who post paywall-bypassing archive links. So don't do that on this post.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't post the article then?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather post it and let people figure out how to access it themselves.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago

You could find an alternative source for the story rather than put other members of the community at risk or inconvenience.

I appreciate you posting it, but I tend to avoid media like that.

[–] jadero@slrpnk.net 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

These are some of the first page results of a mojeek search in Firefox on android for the phrase "steep decline in California solar ".

I didn't find any fancy graphs, but neither did I hit a paywall, possibly because I'm likely a first time visitor to those sites.

I don't vouch for any of those sites. I just popped in to see if they had a paywall and seemed to be covering the same story.

https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2024/jan/26/whats-happened-since-california-cut-home-solar-pay/

https://calmatters.org/environment/climate-change/2024/01/california-solar-demand-plummets/

https://www.latimes.com/environment/newsletter/2023-11-16/column-california-strikes-another-blow-against-rooftop-solar-boiling-point

https://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/story/news/nation/california/2024/01/26/california-cut-home-solar-payments-now-demand-has-plunged-80/72366080007/

https://www.arcamax.com/politics/opeds/s-3044633

[–] nick@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

lol come at me, sfchronicle. Let’s see how your American lawyers do in Europe.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The deal was, if you installed solar panels you could pump the power back into the grid and get credit for it. This subtracted from your power bill. The 'refund' rate for the generated power was enough so solar installation companies made bank.

Last year, they reduced the credit from 20-30 cents to 5 cents per KWh and added an extra 'grid participation' fee that could run $500 extra per year. So the math for installing solar that fed back to the grid no longer made sense. Hence the drop in demand.

None of this had to do with solar + batteries. With batteries you could get off the grid completely but the batteries cost $$$. Given current interest rates, financing was tough. If the cost of batteries drop and interest rates fall, the return on investment will make more sense and the graph will shoot back up.

If California wants to get even more solar adoption, they could incentivize batteries. But that would affect revenue to the power companies (who have lots of lobbyists) so not sure it'll ever happen.

Meanwhile, at least one power utility jacked up their rates by 13%: https://abc7news.com/ca-pge-bill-rate-increase-2024-energy-rates-electricity-bills/14173599/

[–] Truck_kun@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In regards to PG&E's rates, for those interested in how much that 13% brings it up to:

https://www.pge.com/content/dam/pge/docs/account/rate-plans/residential-electric-rate-plan-pricing.pdf

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago