this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
198 points (96.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21211 readers
94 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    top 20 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Is it actually running snap or just unpacking its content and running it as a normal flatpak?

    [–] qaz@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

    It's unpacking the snap and running the contents.

    [–] lengau@midwest.social 12 points 7 months ago

    Neither. The Flatpak is built by unpacking the contents of the snap, after which it's a completely normal Flatpak.

    Snaps are just squashfs images with that package and its dependencies, so if the snap isn't doing something fancy like using patchelf or depending on content snaps, it makes a lot of sense that the snap would be extractable and usable for Flatpak. It's probably doable the other way around too, though as far as I know snapcraft doesn't have an official way to use a Flatpak as its source like Flatpak does with snaps.

    [–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    Is that necessarily bad, though? I always felt that the infrastructure around snap, and not the underlying technology, was what people had problems with.

    Also, this feels like an appropriate time to shill for Aegis instead of Authy. Or any foss 2FA solution, really.

    [–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I never liked the technology of snap. I'm pretty broke and technically could waste money on a new PC but I rather not. So all my laptops and PCs have been stuff I've found in the trash or on the 2nd hand market for under $100. Snap has always ran much slower on older systems that I use. And by much slower I mean MUCH slower. Flatpaks also run slower than native packaging but at least it's usable.

    Huh. I gotta admit that I never tried using it, but that does suck.

    [–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    FreeOTP+ is a good TOTP app for mobile, if anybody is looking for a TOTP app. It's a FOSS fork extending an internal Red Hat app. https://f-droid.org/packages/org.liberty.android.freeotpplus/

    [–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

    Thanks for the suggestion

    [–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

    I personally used to use AndOTP.

    [–] shaked_coffee@feddit.it 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)
    [–] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
    [–] shaked_coffee@feddit.it 16 points 7 months ago

    Ahahah sorry, I know what Authy is.

    Mine wanted to be a way to say that after I discovered Ente Authenticator (the link I attached), which is another 2FA app that keeps an encrypted backup of your codes and lets you access them on multiple platforms and it's foss, I "almost forgot about Authy" since Ente Auth replaced it perfectly for my use case.

    I thought that since is not a very famous project others could have found it useful

    [–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    It has been requested for so long and they still won't release a proper package!

    [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    didn't they announce ending the desktop app?

    [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

    Already happened as of March 18th

    [–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    That sucks. Time to find an alternative.

    [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

    I went for 2FAS, authy doesn't have option to export the codes so it took some time.

    That was the reason I didn't hesitate to choose 2FAS because there is an export option, so if I change my mind it won't be so much of a struggle

    They don't exactly have a desktop app but there is an add-on to autocomplete the codes via phone pushed request

    [–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 7 points 7 months ago
    [–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

    Nah don't use authy. Use Aegis if you're Android or Raivo if you're ios. Both of these are open source and you can back up your secret keys.

    [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

    Spotify too lol. What's so bad about that? It's just a special source form, after it's packaged as flatpak, there are no ages-long startup times or Ubuntu-specific security