Fire season is on the cusp of getting going again this year. I wonder if the tenor of the conversation will look different after summer?
CanadaPolitics
Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees
Rules:
All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
Man, I hope fire season is mild this year. But I hope someone takes notice and does the math if it's significant. And I suspect no one will, as these aren't the "thinking" type as much as they are the impressionable type. I mean, there's fingerprints all over this.
Some of last years fires are still smouldering, and we are getting an early start this year due to the warm dry winter
I'll say it again: the carve-out for heating oil in Atlantic Canada was either a) deeply stupid and shortsighted because it focused everyone's attention on the tax at the exact moment Poillevre was looking for a wedge issue that wasn't pandering to Nazis, or b) the Liberals want to kill it anyways and sabotaging because of a a) is the most passive-aggressive, milquetoast way to do it that still gives them plausible deniabilty.
I lean towards b) because assuming the Liberals are milquetoast, billionaire-boot-polishing cowards who sit so hard on the fence that they wear out pants is probably a safe assumption.
Never forget, this is the LPC that, very early in their mandate, bought the Trans-Mountain Pipeline with plans to gift it back to private industry for pennies on the dollar. We can't do electoral reform without years of committees, but we can buy a pipeline for thirty billion dollars without consulting anyone. To think they care about decarbonizing the economy is laughable, they're just not as moustache-twirlingly evil about it as the Conservatives are.
"There are no alternatives available. So, the key intent of this policy, to lower emissions, is not being achieved at this time."
"The people implemented this policy say it will work" is not the compelling argument you think.