Hacker News

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

Hey HN!

The end of the year is a time of reflection and when many founders decide it's time to make a change and get serious about their startup.

Even though the official YC W24 application deadline was in October, we know there are founders that haven't already applied but are interested in being a part of the batch. These founders have decided now is the time to get serious about their startup.

We didn’t want those people to miss out on the chance to participate in the W24 batch, and we had some extra bandwidth to review late applications, so we’re opening up a special application process just for them.

So, if you’ve been thinking about applying to YC for a while and just got to the point where you are ready to actually do it, you can apply now and get a quick decision rather than waiting for the summer batch.

A few operational details:

1. Apply by December 13 at 5pm Pacific Time. You’ll hear back by December 20th. (Yes, that’s a 7 day turnaround)

2. To be eligible for these late W24 interviews, in your answer to the question “If you have a referral code”, include the string: HNW24 (yes, we made a special referral code for HN so we can understand where our users come from)

3. This is for founders that did not already apply for the W24 batch at some point in the past.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

Hey HN, I’m Surya and I’m excited to show you WarpBuild!

WarpBuild provides fast, secure x86-64 and arm64 Github actions runners. This speeds up your workloads by 30%, at half the cost, and takes ~2mins to get started.

We’ve been seeing pretty good results since we opened up signups a week ago and I’ve shared some numbers publicly here [1].

Currently, we support linux runners for Github organizations (not personal accounts) and MacOS support is coming soon (~Jan).

The way the runners work is deceptively simple: Runners are assigned to hardware that is ideal for build workloads with fast NVMe disks and high single-core performance.

The runners are allocated on VMs, not containers. This provides faster performance and enables use cases requiring (1) nested virtualization for running firecracker and other hypervisors, (2) k8s without relying on kind, and (3) Android emulators on arm64 instances in test workflows.

We also have released a Github Action called Action-Debugger that allows you to SSH into a running workflow for simplifying pesky debugging[2].

The same set of packages that you’d get on Github hosted runners are pre-configured (on x86-64 runners) so everything works out of the box with no modifications needed.

A very minor detail that I’m rather proud of, and I’d love your thoughts on improving it further, is the onboarding flow for the ease of moving workflows to WarpBuild. We’ve also put in a lot of effort into making the workflow start up time where we are as fast or faster than Github.

[1] https://x.com/suryaoruganti/status/1732932591001735419 [2] https://github.com/WarpBuilds/action-debugger, h/t to tmate

Making builds faster by providing optimal hardware and configurations across CI providers is the first step in our mission to make build engineering better.

I’d love your feedback on the product and thoughts on other CI pain points we could solve to enable better collaboration and developer experience.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.