this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
152 points (81.7% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
267 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Wealth is not money, can't buy bread with a staircase.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes and no. Wealth can be used as a proxy, usually via debt, to acquire more wealth. If this wasn't the case, Elon Musk would not have been able to buy Twitter.

This is why renters are absolutely screwed: not only are they spending the same as someone with a mortgage in many cases, but they can't leverage equity at all. Need a car repair done? Send a kid to school? Retire? Invest? If you rent, you're screwed.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We're not talking about Musk here. Most home owners can't leverage their equity to buy some bread.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, they can.

Many (many!) have leveraged their equity into buying more houses to rent out for income, and/or into all sorts of HELOC-related silliness.

I don't think peolle realize how stark the divide is between people with homes and people without, especially for anyone who bought before 2020. We've created, almost overnight, a massive and likely permanent underclass, and we have no intention of putting the kinds of supports in place to deal with the problems that will create over the next few decades as renters are broken by retirement and AI.

We've substituted paying fair wages and having real retirement plans with house value, and now we're on the verge of slamming the door on a huge portion of our society by locking them out of home equity at the same time we're diluting their earnings.

Yes, Musk et al are an extreme example, but the equity gap is real.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Do you even read?

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 10 months ago

Sort of. You can do a one-time conversion to income if you want, and income can of course be diverted towards very slowly building up wealth, but yeah they're not the same thing.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah you can, you can leverage your equity to buy basically anything. Another house for instance...

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you leverage your equity to buy bread, you'll be homeless very soon.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not if your equity is always increasing

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't increase out of thin air.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You're confusing house price with equity.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You can't buy bread with stocks either but Elon is still rich.

The difference is that you can't earn a living by owning your primary residence, so you're still working class.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That's my point. Owning a home doesn't make anyone rich. Owning multiple homes which generate income is a different thing, but people here assume is that if you bough a house in London 20 years ago for pennies, then today you are a fucking Bezos swimming in money. That's not the case.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

Maybe you can't, I bought a bar. It came with an owners suite.