this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
221 points (99.1% liked)
Programming
27535 readers
485 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I say thanks to open source maintainers all the time! ๐
Anyway, while a wall of profanity and fuck you is clearly not ok, I do disagree with this:
Just because you offer something for free doesn't absolve you of all moral responsibility. I'm not saying you have a lot of responsibility, but "it's free so you can't complain!" is pure nonsense.
Go and give some kids free poisoned sweets and see how far that gets you.
I can't think of a single analogous action in providing software for use for free aside from injecting malware, which I'm pretty sure is criminal? No?
I wouldn't call "not intentionally being malicious" a responsibility anymore than following any laws is a real responsibility... responsibility here implies an active duty to do something, not really to not commit crimes. I really can't think of any active responsibility any dev has for software they've put out there. It could literally cause harm to some hardware and they still really wouldn't have a responsibility for anything as long as it isn't (in fact that's for good reason a common disclaimer for things that tweak hardware).
What did you have in mind as responsibilities a dev has?
How is that even remotely comparable